Talk:Taseko Mountain: Difference between revisions
PhotoCatBot (talk | contribs) m merging {{reqphotoin}} to {{reqphoto}}, by the PhotoCat |
AndrewEnns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WikiProject Geography}} |
{{WikiProject Geography}} |
||
{{reqphoto|in=British Columbia}} |
{{reqphoto|in=British Columbia}} |
||
== Coordinates == |
|||
I just started my work here (I've been doing a lot of editing in the [[Chilcotin River|Chilcotin]] area lately) & the first thing that I realized need to be worked on (aside from the references which I fixed in a heartbeat with pleasure [& sugar on top :P]) was the coordinates. I figured this out when I was looking for the mountain on [[Google Earth]]; I typed in "Taseko Mountain" & it took me to... pretty much nowhere... some logging road about 13 kn northeast of Fish Lake. In any case, the coordinates of {{coord|51|32|00|N|123|28|18|W}} did '''NOT''' take me to Taseko Mountain & are obviously incorrect. No worries though; using a topo map I found where the summit really is & now have the correct coordinates ({{51|14|00|N|123|28|25|W}}). I will add them in. Surely coordinates that far off didn't come off [[BCGNIS]], did they? Okay, maybe they just screwed up big time on that one; everyone screws up royally now & then. :) |
|||
By the way, it's pretty cool (I think) that this mountain & [[Moutn Tatlow]] have the ''exact'' same elevation. Obviously it's just a coincidence; it's not like someone took a (giant) level or ruler to their peaks, but still, that's pretty sweet. :P |
|||
On a side note, speaking of Tatlow, I did a [http://www.google.ca/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA342&=&q=mount+tatlow&btnG=Google+Search&meta=lr%3D&aq=f&oq= google search] on it & there is not a lot of stuff about the climbing routes to the summit. I think there is something the local first nations people in the area set up so that people weren't constantly climbing around the peak (I think it is the same with other peaks in the area as well) but honestly, you'd think there would be ''something'' on the climbing routes (I'd love to climb it one day; it's such an awesome looking % prominent peak). You would expect a mountain that turns as many heads as Tatlow would attract climbers & as a result you would think details on climbing it would be easy to find on the Net, but this is obviously not the case with Tatlow. |
|||
Anyway, those were just a few thoughts. Feel free to leave a reply to this if you want; I'll happily converse with you; this area of BC interests me greatly. :) [[User:AndrewEnns|AndrewEnns]] ([[User talk:AndrewEnns|talk]]) 06:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:58, 14 December 2009
Canada: British Columbia / Geography Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Mountains Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Coordinates
I just started my work here (I've been doing a lot of editing in the Chilcotin area lately) & the first thing that I realized need to be worked on (aside from the references which I fixed in a heartbeat with pleasure [& sugar on top :P]) was the coordinates. I figured this out when I was looking for the mountain on Google Earth; I typed in "Taseko Mountain" & it took me to... pretty much nowhere... some logging road about 13 kn northeast of Fish Lake. In any case, the coordinates of 51°32′00″N 123°28′18″W / 51.53333°N 123.47167°W did NOT take me to Taseko Mountain & are obviously incorrect. No worries though; using a topo map I found where the summit really is & now have the correct coordinates (Template:51). I will add them in. Surely coordinates that far off didn't come off BCGNIS, did they? Okay, maybe they just screwed up big time on that one; everyone screws up royally now & then. :)
By the way, it's pretty cool (I think) that this mountain & Moutn Tatlow have the exact same elevation. Obviously it's just a coincidence; it's not like someone took a (giant) level or ruler to their peaks, but still, that's pretty sweet. :P
On a side note, speaking of Tatlow, I did a google search on it & there is not a lot of stuff about the climbing routes to the summit. I think there is something the local first nations people in the area set up so that people weren't constantly climbing around the peak (I think it is the same with other peaks in the area as well) but honestly, you'd think there would be something on the climbing routes (I'd love to climb it one day; it's such an awesome looking % prominent peak). You would expect a mountain that turns as many heads as Tatlow would attract climbers & as a result you would think details on climbing it would be easy to find on the Net, but this is obviously not the case with Tatlow.
Anyway, those were just a few thoughts. Feel free to leave a reply to this if you want; I'll happily converse with you; this area of BC interests me greatly. :) AndrewEnns (talk) 06:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Stub-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- Stub-Class Geography of Canada articles
- Low-importance Geography of Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Stub-Class Mountain articles
- Low-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- Unassessed geography articles
- Unknown-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in British Columbia