Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pispalan kumppanuus ry: Difference between revisions
→Pispalan kumppanuus ry: reasons given for notability |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
''"Organizations whose activities are local in scope may be notable where there is verifiable information from reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, the organization may be included as a section in an article on the organization's local area instead."'' [[User:Andyjsmith|andy]] ([[User talk:Andyjsmith|talk]]) 15:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC) |
''"Organizations whose activities are local in scope may be notable where there is verifiable information from reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, the organization may be included as a section in an article on the organization's local area instead."'' [[User:Andyjsmith|andy]] ([[User talk:Andyjsmith|talk]]) 15:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Currently, no evidence of notability. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 09:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Currently, no evidence of notability. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 09:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
so there are 2 things here: |
|||
1. notability |
|||
2. localness of scope |
|||
1. looking at other wikipedia articles as to what is considered suitably notable this seems to meet those criteria. |
|||
2. as explained in the article discussion there is work with associations outside of the local area (pispala) which is why the article was split from the Pispala article. e.g. World of Tango Festival, project at European level, project in Austria |
|||
the wikipedia guideline here is not easy to follow, as an organization may not have a local area geographically, for example working internationally or being a platform.[[User:Pispalapartnership|Pispalapartnership]] ([[User talk:Pispalapartnership|talk]]) 09:33, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Pispalapartnership |
|||
Revision as of 09:33, 16 December 2009
- Pispalan kumppanuus ry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local organisation, failing WP:ORG which states among other things that "Organizations whose activities are local in scope may be notable where there is verifiable information from reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, the organization may be included as a section in an article on the organization's local area instead." andy (talk) 15:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Currently, no evidence of notability. --Dweller (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
so there are 2 things here:
1. notability 2. localness of scope
1. looking at other wikipedia articles as to what is considered suitably notable this seems to meet those criteria. 2. as explained in the article discussion there is work with associations outside of the local area (pispala) which is why the article was split from the Pispala article. e.g. World of Tango Festival, project at European level, project in Austria
the wikipedia guideline here is not easy to follow, as an organization may not have a local area geographically, for example working internationally or being a platform.Pispalapartnership (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Pispalapartnership