Talk:Flip Video: Difference between revisions
Airplaneman (talk | contribs) add projects and assess |
Airplaneman (talk | contribs) m fix |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject Photography|class=C|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Photography|class=C|importance=mid}} |
||
Revision as of 18:39, 18 December 2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flip Video article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Photography C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Technology C‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Help
I was wondering if there is anyone who would like to help me make this at least a better article.... Thanks. Stealth (talk) 01:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- You might want to try asking on an appropriate WikiProject's talk page. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Merge Mino proposal
I'm proposing that Flip Video Mino be merged here. The Flip Mino isn't substantially different than the Flip Video itself, and is best understood in the context of the main Flip Video article. This will reduce the amount of duplicated information in these two articles. Comments? tedder (talk) 07:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- No responses after 5+ days, so I'm merging. tedder (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Undid this, I want more talk about it. I disagree with this notion. Stealth (talk)
- Can you give some reasons, stealth500? And do you work for Pure Digital? tedder (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think that the Flip Video Mino is a large enough subject and does not need to be merged. I will say however that it should be expanded and otherwise given more references. However I think it should stay, or have both the Flip Video Mino and the Flip Video made into 1 large page instead of a page about the Flip Video and a small section about the mino. Does that sound possible? Also, I am not from pure Digital, I simply own a Flip Video and decided to look up the information and make the page. Stealth (talk)
- A large enough subject? But it's the SMALLER of the Flip Videos! I am now slapping my knee and laughing silently. Good day. 67.161.21.212 (talk) 01:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think that the Flip Video Mino is a large enough subject and does not need to be merged. I will say however that it should be expanded and otherwise given more references. However I think it should stay, or have both the Flip Video Mino and the Flip Video made into 1 large page instead of a page about the Flip Video and a small section about the mino. Does that sound possible? Also, I am not from pure Digital, I simply own a Flip Video and decided to look up the information and make the page. Stealth (talk)
- Can you give some reasons, stealth500? And do you work for Pure Digital? tedder (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Undid this, I want more talk about it. I disagree with this notion. Stealth (talk)
(deindenting) My reasoning for wanting to merge them is due to the reasons on the merge guidelines page; there is almost complete overlap between the two pages, and the two products are best understood in the context of each other. In other words, what's the difference between the Flip and the Flip Mino? It's a lot easier to understand the differences when they are on one page. I certainly agree that there should be more information on the Mino (rather than how it is currently, where there's more about the original), but that doesn't seem to be relevant to a discussion about merging. tedder (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)