Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food Network Humor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
URBAN-ANDY (talk | contribs) |
→Food Network Humor: del |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Comment''' Anon IP was the article's author, who was paid to write the article (and is now blocked by myself for abusive sock puppetry to hide his paid editing). [[User:Brandon|Brandon]] ([[User talk:Brandon|talk]]) 19:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' Anon IP was the article's author, who was paid to write the article (and is now blocked by myself for abusive sock puppetry to hide his paid editing). [[User:Brandon|Brandon]] ([[User talk:Brandon|talk]]) 19:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
:*'''Comment''' Never the less the article's issues state good reason for deletion regardless of abusive sock puppetry. [[User:URBAN-ANDY|URBAN-ANDY]] ([[User talk:URBAN-ANDY|talk]]) 20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
:*'''Comment''' Never the less the article's issues state good reason for deletion regardless of abusive sock puppetry. [[User:URBAN-ANDY|URBAN-ANDY]] ([[User talk:URBAN-ANDY|talk]]) 20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as non-notable website. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] <small>[[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]]</small> 21:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:53, 18 December 2009
- Food Network Humor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Website for which notability is not sufficiently established. References are primary or a blog (supposedly a celebrity blog, but there's no article for the individual concerned). (Also needs a considerable cleanup because it's promotional and presented as a guide - those in themselves are not reason to delete, but suggest a possible COI by the writer.) Speedy tag (placed some time ago) removed without explanation by an anon IP. I42 (talk) 19:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Anon IP was the article's author, who was paid to write the article (and is now blocked by myself for abusive sock puppetry to hide his paid editing). Brandon (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Never the less the article's issues state good reason for deletion regardless of abusive sock puppetry. URBAN-ANDY (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable website. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)