Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodiak Island UFO sighting: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:47, 19 December 2009

Kodiak Island UFO sighting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Here are the facts: In September 2007 something crashed somewhere in the vicinity of Kodiak Island. The local paper devoted a few paragraphs to it. A Wikipedia article based on that report and subsequent postings at UFO websites was created. The article has languished in this state for nearly two years, with only one reliable source, and that just a single column story in a local paper. It's worth noting that nearby news organs in Anchorage and on the Kenai Peninsula did not pick up this story. Seems to fail the notability guideline. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 20:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree, there isn't enough here to support an article. If additional sources became available, it would be a different story - but there have been 2 years during which something could have been found, and nothing. My own (limited) search reveals nothing at all. So, delete. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacking any followup, there's no way that it can be determined whether this is truly notable or not. No coverage for two years suggests it's probably a minor event. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - So. Beeblebrox, you and I had a little disagreement when I first started the article and it has been refined and edited while under the Wikipedia:Spotlight for several months. This event occured in September of 2007, more than two years prior to today. Suddenly, you feel the urge to delete it? Tell me, are any of you people familiar with the scale of the majority of major UFO sightings? They last for only a few seconds, at best, and rarely occur over a major metropolitan center. The UFO was not sighted over Anchorage, but Kodiak, Alaska and Homer, Alaska. Because there is a such a small population, you, Voiceofreason01, UltraExactZZ and Tony Fox declare that it does not deserve Wikipedia. However, take the scale and match it up with other UFO sightings with articles. Most of them contain similar witness testimonies and similar numbers.

Honestly, I cannot discuss this much further as I have progressed past this article and focus mostly upon other Wikipedia articles and more real-world events. Should you delete this article, may I suggest you nominate the other UFO articles for deletion? Assuming that you're naming UFO sightings insignificant, it will be completely understandable. DarthBotto_talk•cont 16:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:46, 19 December 2009 edit Botto (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 12,648 edits →Kodiak Island UFO sighting ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:47, 19 December 2009 edit undo Botto (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 12,648 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*'''Keep''' - So. [[User:Beeblebrox\|Beeblebrox]], you and I had a little disagreement when I first started the article and it has been refined and edited while under the [[Wikipedia:Spotlight]] for several months. This event occured in September of 2007, more than two years prior to today. Suddenly, you feel the urge to delete it? Tell me, are any of you people familiar with the scale of the majority of major UFO sightings? They last for only a few seconds, at best, and rarely occur over a major metropolitan center. The UFO was not sighted over Anchorage, but [[Kodiak, Alaska]] and [[Homer, Alaska]]. Because there is a such a small population, you, [[User:Voiceofreason01\|Voiceofreason01]], [[User:Ultraexactzz\|UltraExactZZ]] and [[User:Tony Fox\|Tony Fox]] declare that it does not deserve Wikipedia. However, take the scale and match it up with other UFO sightings with articles. Most of them contain similar witness testimonies and similar numbers.		*'''Keep''' - So. [[User:Beeblebrox\|Beeblebrox]], you and I had a little disagreement when I first started the article and it has been refined and edited while under the [[Wikipedia:Spotlight]] for several months. This event occured in September of 2007, more than two years prior to today. Suddenly, you feel the urge to delete it? Tell me, are any of you people familiar with the scale of the majority of major UFO sightings? They last for only a few seconds, at best, and rarely occur over a major metropolitan center. The UFO was not sighted over Anchorage, but [[Kodiak, Alaska]] and [[Homer, Alaska]]. Because there is a such a small population, you, [[User:Voiceofreason01\|Voiceofreason01]], [[User:Ultraexactzz\|UltraExactZZ]] and [[User:Tony Fox\|Tony Fox]] declare that it does not deserve Wikipedia. However, take the scale and match it up with other UFO sightings with articles. Most of them contain similar witness testimonies and similar numbers.

	Honestly, I cannot discuss this much further as I have progressed past this article and focus mostly upon other Wikipedia articles and more real-world events. Should you delete this article, may I suggest you nominate the other UFO articles for deletion? Assuming that you're naming UFO sightings insignificant, it will be completely understandable. [[User:DarthBotto\|D<small>arth</small>B<small>otto</small>]]<sub> [[User talk:DarthBotto\|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/DarthBotto\|cont]]</sub> 16:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)		:Honestly, I cannot discuss this much further as I have progressed past this article and focus mostly upon other Wikipedia articles and more real-world events. Should you delete this article, may I suggest you nominate the other UFO articles for deletion? Assuming that you're naming UFO sightings insignificant, it will be completely understandable. [[User:DarthBotto\|D<small>arth</small>B<small>otto</small>]]<sub> [[User talk:DarthBotto\|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/DarthBotto\|cont]]</sub> 16:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)