Group of Two: Difference between revisions
Polylepsis (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:China USA Locator.png|right|200px|link=|alt=]] |
[[File:China USA Locator.png|right|200px|link=|alt=]] |
||
The [[Group of Two]] ( |
The [[Group of Two]] ('''G-2''' or '''G2''') is a proposed informal [[Special relationship (international relations)|special relationship]] between the [[United States]] and [[People's Republic of China|China]]. Originally initated by [[C. Fred Bergsten]] as primarily an economic relationship, it began to gain wider currency and scope from foreign policy experts as a term recognizing the centrality of the [[Sino-American relations|U.S.-China relationship]] near the beginning of the [[Obama Administration]]. Prominent advocates include former [[National Security Advisor (United States)|National Security Advisor]] [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], historian [[Niall Ferguson]], World Bank President [[Robert Zoellick]] and chief economist [[Justin Yifu Lin]]. |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
The concept of a G-2 was first raised by noted economist [[C. Fred Bergsten]] in 2005.<ref>http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65232/c-fred-bergsten/twos-company</ref> Bergsten |
The concept of a G-2 was first raised by noted economist [[C. Fred Bergsten]] in 2005.<ref>http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65232/c-fred-bergsten/twos-company</ref> In 2009, Bergsten made the following arguments for such a relationship: |
||
* "the two together accounted for almost one half of all global growth during the four-year boom prior to the crisis;" |
* "the two together accounted for almost one half of all global growth during the four-year boom prior to the crisis;" |
||
* "they are the two largest trading nations;" |
* "they are the two largest trading nations;" |
||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
* "they are the leaders of the two groups, the high-income industrialized countries and the emerging markets/developing nations, that each now account for about one half of global output."<ref>http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=1291</ref> |
* "they are the leaders of the two groups, the high-income industrialized countries and the emerging markets/developing nations, that each now account for about one half of global output."<ref>http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=1291</ref> |
||
[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], former [[U.S. National Security Advisor]] has been a vocal advocate for the concept. He advanced the notion in Beijing in January 2009 as the two countries celebrated the 30th anniversary of establishing formal diplomatic ties.<ref>http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KE29Ad01.html</ref> |
[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], former [[U.S. National Security Advisor]] has been a vocal advocate for the concept. He publicly advanced the notion in [[Beijing]] in January 2009 as the two countries celebrated the 30th anniversary of establishing formal diplomatic ties.<ref>http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KE29Ad01.html</ref> He views the informal G-2 as helpful in finding solutions to the [[global financial crisis]], [[climate change]], [[Iran's nuclear program]], the [[Indo-Pakistani relations|India-Pakistan tensions]], the [[Israeli-Palestinian conflict]].<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/world/asia/12iht-beijing.3.19283773.html</ref><ref>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d99369b8-e178-11dd-afa0-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1</ref> |
||
Historian [[Niall Ferguson]] has also advocated the G-2 concept. |
Historian [[Niall Ferguson]] has also advocated the G-2 concept. He coined the term [[Chimerica]] to describe the symbiotic nature of the U.S.-China economic relationship. |
||
[[Robert Zoellick]], president of the [[World Bank]], and [[Justin Yifu Lin]], the Bank's chief economist and senior vice president, |
[[Robert Zoellick]], president of the [[World Bank]], and [[Justin Yifu Lin]], the Bank's chief economist and senior vice president, has stated that the G-2 is crucial for economic recovery and that the U.S. and China must work together. They state that "without a strong G-2, the [[G-20]] will disappoint."<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/05/AR2009030502887.html</ref> |
||
As the two most influential and powerful countries in the world, there has been increasingly strong suggestions within American political circles of creating a G-2 relationship where the United States and China would work out solutions to global problems together.<ref>http://www.fpa.org/topics_info2414/topics_info_show.htm?doc_id=912530</ref> |
As the two most influential and powerful countries in the world, there has been increasingly strong suggestions within American political circles of creating a G-2 relationship where the United States and China would work out solutions to global problems together.<ref>http://www.fpa.org/topics_info2414/topics_info_show.htm?doc_id=912530</ref> |
||
While widely discussed, the concept of a G-2 has not been fully defined. According to Brzezinski, G-2 described the current realities while for British Foreign Secretary [[David Miliband]], a G-2 could emerge in the foreseeable future.<ref>http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KE29Ad01.html</ref> Miliband |
While widely discussed, the concept of a G-2 has not been fully defined. According to Brzezinski, G-2 described the current realities while for British Foreign Secretary [[David Miliband]], a G-2 could emerge in the foreseeable future.<ref>http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KE29Ad01.html</ref> Miliband proposes EU integration as a means to create a potential G-3 that consists of the United States, China and [[Europe]]. |
||
China has officially stated that it does not agree to a G-2 system to make decisions for the world but prefers a multipolar world. Premier [[Wen Jiabao]] said this to President Barack Obama during his visit to China. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 02:42, 30 December 2009
The Group of Two (G-2 or G2) is a proposed informal special relationship between the United States and China. Originally initated by C. Fred Bergsten as primarily an economic relationship, it began to gain wider currency and scope from foreign policy experts as a term recognizing the centrality of the U.S.-China relationship near the beginning of the Obama Administration. Prominent advocates include former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, historian Niall Ferguson, World Bank President Robert Zoellick and chief economist Justin Yifu Lin.
History
The concept of a G-2 was first raised by noted economist C. Fred Bergsten in 2005.[1] In 2009, Bergsten made the following arguments for such a relationship:
- "the two together accounted for almost one half of all global growth during the four-year boom prior to the crisis;"
- "they are the two largest trading nations;"
- "they are the two largest polluters;"
- "they are on opposite ends of the world's largest trade and financial imbalance: the United States is the largest deficit and debtor country while China is the largest surplus country and holder of dollar reserves; and"
- "they are the leaders of the two groups, the high-income industrialized countries and the emerging markets/developing nations, that each now account for about one half of global output."[2]
Zbigniew Brzezinski, former U.S. National Security Advisor has been a vocal advocate for the concept. He publicly advanced the notion in Beijing in January 2009 as the two countries celebrated the 30th anniversary of establishing formal diplomatic ties.[3] He views the informal G-2 as helpful in finding solutions to the global financial crisis, climate change, Iran's nuclear program, the India-Pakistan tensions, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.[4][5]
Historian Niall Ferguson has also advocated the G-2 concept. He coined the term Chimerica to describe the symbiotic nature of the U.S.-China economic relationship.
Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, and Justin Yifu Lin, the Bank's chief economist and senior vice president, has stated that the G-2 is crucial for economic recovery and that the U.S. and China must work together. They state that "without a strong G-2, the G-20 will disappoint."[6]
As the two most influential and powerful countries in the world, there has been increasingly strong suggestions within American political circles of creating a G-2 relationship where the United States and China would work out solutions to global problems together.[7]
While widely discussed, the concept of a G-2 has not been fully defined. According to Brzezinski, G-2 described the current realities while for British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, a G-2 could emerge in the foreseeable future.[8] Miliband proposes EU integration as a means to create a potential G-3 that consists of the United States, China and Europe.
China has officially stated that it does not agree to a G-2 system to make decisions for the world but prefers a multipolar world. Premier Wen Jiabao said this to President Barack Obama during his visit to China.
See also
- Chimerica
- Sino-American relations
- U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue
- 2009 G-20 London Summit
- 2009 G-20 Pittsburgh summit
- 2009 Barack Obama visit to China
References
- ^ http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65232/c-fred-bergsten/twos-company
- ^ http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=1291
- ^ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KE29Ad01.html
- ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/world/asia/12iht-beijing.3.19283773.html
- ^ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d99369b8-e178-11dd-afa0-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1
- ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/05/AR2009030502887.html
- ^ http://www.fpa.org/topics_info2414/topics_info_show.htm?doc_id=912530
- ^ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/KE29Ad01.html
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
