Reverse innovation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Typically, companies start their globalization efforts by removing expensive features from their established product, and attempt to sell these de-featured products in the developing world. This approach, unfortunately, is not very competitive, and targets only the most affluent segments of society in these developing countries. Reverse innovation, on the other hand, leads to products which are created locally in developing countries, tested in local markets, and, if successful, then upgraded for sale and delivery in the developed world. |
Typically, companies start their globalization efforts by removing expensive features from their established product, and attempt to sell these de-featured products in the developing world. This approach, unfortunately, is not very competitive, and targets only the most affluent segments of society in these developing countries. Reverse innovation, on the other hand, leads to products which are created locally in developing countries, tested in local markets, and, if successful, then upgraded for sale and delivery in the developed world. |
||
The phenomenon of reverse innovation was originally described using a different term - '''innovation blowback''' - by [[John Hagel III]] and [[John Seely Brown]] in their 2005 ''McKinsey Quarterly'' article titled ''Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia.''<ref>{{cite web |title=Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia ''(McKinsey Quarterly)'' |url=http://www.johnseelybrown.com/innovationblowback.pdf |accessdate=1 January 2010 }}</ref> |
The phenomenon of reverse innovation was originally described using a different term - '''innovation blowback''' - by [[John Hagel III]] and [[John Seely Brown]] in their 2005 ''McKinsey Quarterly'' article titled ''Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia.''<ref>{{cite web |title=Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia ''(McKinsey Quarterly)'' |url=http://www.johnseelybrown.com/innovationblowback.pdf |accessdate=1 January 2010 }}</ref> In essence, their message warns that "the periphery of today's global business environment is where innovation potential is the highest... Edges define and describe the borders of companies, markets, industries, geographies, intellectual disciplines, and generations. They are the places where unmet customer needs find unexpected solutions, where disruptive innovations and blue oceans get birthed, and where edge capabilities transform the core competencies of the corporation." <ref>{{cite web |title=Embrace the Edge -- or Perish ''(BusinessWeek)'' |url=http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/nov2007/id20071128_162890.htm |accessdate=1 January 2010 }}</ref> |
||
[[C.K. Prahalad]]<ref>{{cite web |title=5 Tips for Trickle-Up Innovation from C.K. Prahalad ''(BusinessWeek)'' |url=http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/04/5_tips_for_tric.html |accessdate=22 October 2009 }}</ref> explains that there are five ways in which resource-starved developing countries lead rich nations: 1) affordability, 2) leapfrog technologies, 3) service ecosystems, 4) robust systems, and 5) add-on applications. These very deprivations are catalysts for reverse innovation. |
[[C.K. Prahalad]]<ref>{{cite web |title=5 Tips for Trickle-Up Innovation from C.K. Prahalad ''(BusinessWeek)'' |url=http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/04/5_tips_for_tric.html |accessdate=22 October 2009 }}</ref> explains that there are five ways in which resource-starved developing countries lead rich nations: 1) affordability, 2) leapfrog technologies, 3) service ecosystems, 4) robust systems, and 5) add-on applications. These very deprivations are catalysts for reverse innovation. |
Revision as of 06:18, 2 January 2010
This article may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. |
Reverse innovation or trickle-up innovation is a term referring to an innovation seen first, or likely to be used first, in the developing world before spreading to the industrialized world. The term was introduced by Dartmouth professors Vijay Govindarajan and Chris Trimble and GE's Jeffrey R. Immelt.[1][2][3][4][1] Reverse innovation refers broadly to the process whereby goods developed as inexpensive models to meet the needs of developing nations, such as battery-operated medical instruments in countries with limited infrastructure, are then repackaged as low-cost innovative goods for Western buyers.
The process of reverse innovation begins by focusing on needs and requirements for low-cost products in countries like India and China. Once products are developed for these markets, they are then sold elsewhere - even in the West - at low prices which creates new markets and uses for these innovations.
Typically, companies start their globalization efforts by removing expensive features from their established product, and attempt to sell these de-featured products in the developing world. This approach, unfortunately, is not very competitive, and targets only the most affluent segments of society in these developing countries. Reverse innovation, on the other hand, leads to products which are created locally in developing countries, tested in local markets, and, if successful, then upgraded for sale and delivery in the developed world.
The phenomenon of reverse innovation was originally described using a different term - innovation blowback - by John Hagel III and John Seely Brown in their 2005 McKinsey Quarterly article titled Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia.[5] In essence, their message warns that "the periphery of today's global business environment is where innovation potential is the highest... Edges define and describe the borders of companies, markets, industries, geographies, intellectual disciplines, and generations. They are the places where unmet customer needs find unexpected solutions, where disruptive innovations and blue oceans get birthed, and where edge capabilities transform the core competencies of the corporation." [6]
C.K. Prahalad[7] explains that there are five ways in which resource-starved developing countries lead rich nations: 1) affordability, 2) leapfrog technologies, 3) service ecosystems, 4) robust systems, and 5) add-on applications. These very deprivations are catalysts for reverse innovation.
Examples of reverse innovation can be found across various industries and geographies:[8][9][10]
- Nokia is testing new business models for classified ads in Kenya; it has also created new features in its hand-held phones sold in the US, based on observations of how phones are shared in Ghana.
- Microsoft is creating new phone app services for "dumb" phones which allow users with existing, non-smartphone devices to access Web sites such as Twitter, Facebook. Built for markets in India and South Africa, there is surprising potential for these apps as a low-cost cloud computing platform.
- GE is now selling an ultra-portable electrocardiograph machine in the U.S. at an 80% markdown for similar products. The machine was originally built by GE Healthcare for doctors in India and China.
- Tata Motors is planning to sell an upgraded version of the Tata Nano in western markets; it's called Tata Europa.
- Procter & Gamble found that a honey-based cold remedy created for Mexico also had a profitable market in Europe and the United States.
- Nestlé learned that it could sell its low-cost, low-fat dried noodles originally created for rural India and position the same product as a healthy alternative in Australia and New Zealand.
Reverse innovations, it must be noted, are not always disruptive innovations.[11]
References
- ^ a b "How GE is Disrupting Itself. (Harvard Business Review)" (PDF). Retrieved 21 October 2009.
- ^ "Emory Marketing Institute Interview with Vijay Govindarajan". Retrieved 22 October 2009.
- ^ "GE's Immelt Says 'Reverse Innovation' Needed for Global Growth (Bloomberg)". Retrieved 21 October 2009.
- ^ "The Case for 'Reverse Innovation' Now (BusinessWeek)". Retrieved 28 October 2009.
- ^ "Innovation blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia (McKinsey Quarterly)" (PDF). Retrieved 1 January 2010.
- ^ "Embrace the Edge -- or Perish (BusinessWeek)". Retrieved 1 January 2010.
- ^ "5 Tips for Trickle-Up Innovation from C.K. Prahalad (BusinessWeek)". Retrieved 22 October 2009.
- ^ "How Innovations from Developing Nations Trickle-Up to the West (Fast Company)". Retrieved 22 October 2009.
- ^ "Innovation Trickles in a New Direction (BusinessWeek)". Retrieved 22 October 2009.
- ^ "Microsoft bets on making "dumb" phones smarter (BusinessWeek)". Retrieved 22 October 2009.
- ^ "Is Reverse Innovation Like Disruptive Innovation? (Harvard Business Review Voices)". Retrieved 21 October 2009.