Talk:Institute of technology: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 62.204.233.210 - "→Oldest Institute of Technology in the world: " |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
This apparent contradiction needs to be solved. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Marv Fletch|Marv Fletch]] ([[User talk:Marv Fletch|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Marv Fletch|contribs]]) 21:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This apparent contradiction needs to be solved. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Marv Fletch|Marv Fletch]] ([[User talk:Marv Fletch|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Marv Fletch|contribs]]) 21:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
One more to the controversy, In section "Czech Republic", "Czech Technical University in Prague" is mentioned to be founded in 1707. Seems to be much older then both mentioned above. |
One more to the controversy, In section "Czech Republic", "Czech Technical University in Prague" is mentioned to be founded in 1707. Seems to be much older then both mentioned above. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.204.233.210|62.204.233.210]] ([[User talk:62.204.233.210|talk]]) 13:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 13:57, 3 January 2010
Education C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Higher education C‑class | |||||||
|
Distinct pages?
Should Institute of technology and Polytechnic be seperated once again as two distinct pages? This article appears to be struggling to reconcile the two...with only a small mention of their historically vast differences over several decades of their evolution.--Huaiwei 05:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Probably what needs to be better clarified is that both terms have been used for both Universities and for what in Australia is called Technical and Further Education with a more vocational education focus. Splitting would still require this to be explained. There is substantial overlap as different national education systems tend to use one or the other. Paul foord 13:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Or both...with different meanings for each. Which is why it is inherently difficult to lump everything together in one article when they can mean quite different things. Singapore, for example, still have Polytechnics which are not considered universities. Perhaps it makes better sense for each school type to have its own page, emphasizing on particular localities and institutions which uses that term or system, while also discussing similarities with other terminologies/systems, whether contemporarily or historically?--Huaiwei 13:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Institues of Technology vs. Polytechnics
I have added three requests for {{fact}} in the text as a number of conclusions are drawn in the article and need referencing. Djegan 18:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
IITs
I seriously doubt the Indian Institutes of Technology are "Institutes of technology" as described in this article, despite the name. The IITs are not polytechnic, ITIs (Industrial Training Institute, which are also located in India) are. When I went about correcting this, I found that this "mis"-information is present in many other articles as well. In order to confirm, I did extensive google searching, and could not find any direct mention of IITs as vocational institutes or polytechnics from any source other than mirrors of Wikipedia. I have removed the info from Indian Institutes of Technology article, but want to discuss before making changes throughout Wikipedia. Another clarification...In India, all engineering degrees take four years, as with the BTech in IITs. Hence there is again no correlation with professional BTech as mentioned in some of the articles. If any of you feel otherwise, please provide verifiable sources that back the claims. I again want to mention that despite similarities in name, in India the meaning of Institute of Technology is very different from the European definition. Though IITs give a few PG diplomas, it will be wrong to label the whole university as vocational institute. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Further note: Though I mentioned IITs, the National Institutes of Technology also fit the same profile and whatever decision is taken, will apply to them also. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Another section in the article discusses IIT's using the term "institute of technology" for "historical reasons" which is quite true (backing my statement). However, the article still mentions IIT in "India" section, which is confusing. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 13:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Article on Vocational universities
What overlap is there with the article on Vocational universities? Paul foord 14:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
==
What language was this (rather badly) translated from?
"and diminute number of highly distinguished alumni and professors..." Diminute is an obsolete word, in English at least. Someone should update his dictionary/thesaurus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.62.47 (talk) 01:31, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Oldest Institute of Technology in the world
In section 1 Institutes of technology versus polytechnics the following sentence is written: "An exception is the Ecole Polytechnique, the oldest one in the world, which has educated French élites since its foundation in 1794."
However, in section 12 Hungary, the following statement is found: "One of the oldest (est. 1782) Universities of Technology of the world is locatad in Budapest."
This apparent contradiction needs to be solved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marv Fletch (talk • contribs) 21:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
One more to the controversy, In section "Czech Republic", "Czech Technical University in Prague" is mentioned to be founded in 1707. Seems to be much older then both mentioned above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.204.233.210 (talk) 13:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC)