Talk:Joel Chandler Harris

"The rabbit in Africa was called Zomo." What's the point of this sentence? It just doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of the article about the Uncle Remus stories. Are you trying to tie Uncle Remus & Brer Rabbit to African legends? if so, you should probably be more clear about that in the article. Billy Shears 14:23, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Some actual information about the guy would be nice, am i rite? User.lain 03:14, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't believe that the H.L. Mencken paragraph is relevant. While it touches on some important topics regarding Harris, it says more about Mencken than it does Harris. I'll delete this one once I become more familiar with editing pages and, if I can find it, replace this quote with another by Mencken that's more direct. BardSeed 19:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

The claim that Rabbit was learned from Native Americans is false. There may have been some syncretism, but the Trickster God, Manabozho (Hare) and his stories are well documented. http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/african-mythology.php?deity=HARE --Salsassin (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

"I've significantly expanded this page over the past few days and would appreciate any help with adding sources or information, or subtracting clutter and bias. Harris' journalism is slightly less ambiguous than his work with Uncle Remus, but it hasn't been explored in much detail by scholars. There's a new peer-reviewed journal article on the subject coming out this fall, however, and I'll be sure to include it once I get a copy." BardSeed (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

"Before Uncle Remus, there was nothing else like the stories in Western literature for children or adults". Is this really what John Goldthwaite says? If so, it's a bizarre statement. Aesop's Fables, dating from around 620 BC, had an enormous influence on Western literature for children and adults, especially in the 17th century French versions by Jean de la Fontaine. European folk tales had many animal characters. There was a series of medieval tales about Reynard the Fox. As an educated man, Harris was surely aware of at least some of these. His achievement was to present the African-American folklore as told by Uncle Remus in the same way as the folk-tales from classical Greece were presented under the name of Aesop - who was also a slave.Zephirine (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Good points! Harris was very familiar with Reynard the Fox and, of course, Aesop. I think the point Goldthwaite is talking specifically about the "newness" surrounding animals as fully fleshed, humanized personages (instead of, for instance, the very basic animals in Aesop's fables), plus the use of dialect which was foreign to many readers, plus the episodic, continuous nature of the tales. Here's what it says on page 256: "Yet before the publication of Uncle Remus in 1881 there was nothing like, and for fifty years after there was little else of note in make-believe but the the Uncle Remus order of serial adventures in the countryside. However else we regard the book, it is irrefutably the central event in the making of modern children's story." BardSeed (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Hm, I still think Goldthwaite is exaggerating somewhat - there are animal characters in Alice in Wonderland (1865) which are certainly individual humanized characters although often eccentric. I feel that the statement "Harris' influence on children's writers like Kipling, Milne, Potter, and Burgess can hardly be overstated." shouldn't be made unless there are references to show that those writers knew and admired Harris's work. It would certainly be interesting to know if Kipling was encouraged to use dialect in stories and poems because of Uncle Remus, it seems likely. On the other hand Potter seems more likely to have been influenced by la Fontaine, and most of her stories are self-contained like Aesop's Fables, there's very little serial content or use of dialect. Also, Goldthwaite's statement that "for fifty years after there was little else of note" would take us up to 1931 and discard a whole range of classic children's books as of little note! Perhaps he's only referring to animal stories?Zephirine (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Word. I'll rework this to (a) remove the more hyperbolic stuff and (b) add in more citations to specific instances from different sources. There is plenty of evidence of Harris' influence on Kipling, for example, who would memorize the stories and then reenact them with his classmates. While I'm at it, I'll update the journalism section with information from new scholarship that came out in late 2009. Thanks for helping out, I really appreciate your input! BardSeed (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)