Talk:AFI's Greatest Movie Musicals: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:16, 9 January 2010

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LIST A PUBLIC DOMAIN PLS DON'T REMOVE

List is a public domain, A user wrote to the AFI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:AFI%27s_100_Years..._100_Movies

Permissions

For copyright clarification for this list, please see OTRS ticket 2007041310002766. Mak (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no muppet treasure island? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.104.178 (talk) 01:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Omission

A notable omission is Oliver! which was a British film although distributed by Columbia. It was however a huge success in America, winning six oscars including best film and best director. I presume it was excluded simply upon an eligibility basis. It has an incredible number of good songs, and would surely be in the top five had it been included among the entrants.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 no muppet treasure island?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.61.104.178|24.61.104.178]] ([[User talk:24.61.104.178|talk]]) 01:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==Omission==
+A notable omission is Oliver! which was a British film although distributed by Columbia. It was however a huge success in America, winning six oscars including best film and best director. I presume it was excluded simply upon an eligibility basis.
+It has an incredible number of good songs, and would surely be in the top five had it been included among the entrants.