Talk:MU: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The stuff about "mu" (in Zen Buddhism) does perhaps belong, but not as a dialogue taken from GEB! This is an encyclopedia! :-) --[[LMS]] |
The stuff about "mu" (in Zen Buddhism) does perhaps belong, but not as a dialogue taken from GEB! This is an encyclopedia! :-) --[[LMS]] |
||
It's just a conspiracy ([[Ur]], no that takes more'n one...) to instigate editing. I don't know much about Zen, but I thought it was cute and might entice someone to put in some real info. Hmmm, I wonder if I link [[Ur]] someone will write about the city .... --[[hornlo|loh]] (2001-06-15) |
It's just a conspiracy ([[Ur]], no that takes more'n one...) to instigate editing. I don't know much about Zen, but I thought it was cute and might entice someone to put in some real info. Hmmm, I wonder if I link [[Ur]] someone will write about the city .... --[[hornlo|loh]] (2001-06-15) |
||
Thanks for the update to the Zen type of "mu". What I had put was a little scattered and off the top of my head. --Joshua Eckroth |
|||
Revision as of 00:32, 6 October 2001
The stuff about "mu" (in Zen Buddhism) does perhaps belong, but not as a dialogue taken from GEB! This is an encyclopedia! :-) --LMS
It's just a conspiracy (Ur, no that takes more'n one...) to instigate editing. I don't know much about Zen, but I thought it was cute and might entice someone to put in some real info. Hmmm, I wonder if I link Ur someone will write about the city .... --loh (2001-06-15)
Thanks for the update to the Zen type of "mu". What I had put was a little scattered and off the top of my head. --Joshua Eckroth