Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodeLobster: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software |
Marasmusine (talk | contribs) additional |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Page continues to be without verification ([[WP:V]]) or assertion of notability ([[WP:N]]). Proposed for deletion last April; contested by [[User:Codelobster]] with no explaination or attempt to address the issue. Google search shows no News hits, and a hundred or so download sites on Web hits, none of which provide reliable, significant coverage. [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 14:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC) |
Page continues to be without verification ([[WP:V]]) or assertion of notability ([[WP:N]]). Proposed for deletion last April; contested by [[User:Codelobster]] with no explaination or attempt to address the issue. Google search shows no News hits, and a hundred or so download sites on Web hits, none of which provide reliable, significant coverage. [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 14:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- - [[w:User:EdoDodo|<font color="#21421E" face="Harrington">EdoDodo</font>]] <sup>[[w:User talk:EdoDodo|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#33dd44">talk</span>]]</sup> 16:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- - [[w:User:EdoDodo|<font color="#21421E" face="Harrington">EdoDodo</font>]] <sup>[[w:User talk:EdoDodo|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#33dd44">talk</span>]]</sup> 16:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*Oh, I'm aware of its mention in O'Reilly's "Windows Vista Annoyances", but it is trivial [http://books.google.com/books?id=5SbK_xPgnK8C&pg=PT563&dq=%22CodeLobster%22+-inpublisher:icon&as_brr=0&ei=YyhKS-_nLZHiygTjloj4DQ&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22CodeLobster%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false]. [[User:Marasmusine|Marasmusine]] ([[User talk:Marasmusine|talk]]) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:22, 10 January 2010
- CodeLobster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page continues to be without verification (WP:V) or assertion of notability (WP:N). Proposed for deletion last April; contested by User:Codelobster with no explaination or attempt to address the issue. Google search shows no News hits, and a hundred or so download sites on Web hits, none of which provide reliable, significant coverage. Marasmusine (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- - EdoDodo talk 16:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm aware of its mention in O'Reilly's "Windows Vista Annoyances", but it is trivial [1]. Marasmusine (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)