Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Blu: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:15, 10 January 2010

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsigned artist that doesn't appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 07:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 08:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't appear to meet WP:RS and WP:MUSIC. South Bay (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Who is this guy? No coverage or albums of note. Should have been speedied. Rasputin72 (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Completely fails WP:MUSIC. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — No sources available and unsourced BLP. Gosox(55)(55) 19:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should have been speedied, both as failing to claim notability and as clear advertising. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note here: the article is clearly not speediable as it is obviously claiming some degree of recognition and popularity. That's enough to pass the assertion of importance test at CSD. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 21:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *[[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] '''Delete''' — No sources available and unsourced BLP. [[User:Gosox5555|Gosox]]([[User_talk:Gosox5555|55]])([[Special:Contributions/Gosox5555|55]]) 19:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' should have been speedied, both as failing to claim notability and as clear advertising. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 20:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
+*:Just a note here: the article is clearly not speediable as it is obviously claiming some degree of recognition and popularity. That's enough to pass the assertion of importance test at CSD. [[User:Wisdom89|'''<font color="#660000">Wisdom89</font>''']] <sub>([[User_talk:Wisdom89|<small><sub><font color="#17001E">T</font></sub></small>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Wisdom89|<small><sup><font color="#17001E">C</font></sup></small>]])</sub> 21:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)