Talk:Explosive ordnance disposal (United States Navy): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:34, 14 January 2010

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Why does Navy EOD need there own page?

Seriosly, Army EOD, Marine EOD, and Air Force EOD, dont have pages. Why does Navy EOD need one? I recommend we take this down, or at least make it so it doesen't read like a recruitment ad.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 |B5=
 }}
+== Why does Navy EOD need there own page? ==
+Seriosly, Army EOD, Marine EOD, and Air Force EOD, dont have pages. Why does Navy EOD need one? I recommend we take this down, or at least make it so it doesen't read like a recruitment ad.