User talk:Corruptcopper

Welcome!

Hello, Corruptcopper! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 16:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Good to see you're here as well as on the Simple English Wikipedia. --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 16:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hello Corruptcopper, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback.

In addition, I noticed that you currently don't have many edits, but at the same time, the vandalism-reverting that you did was good. Remember, if you find edit edit that needs reverting, but think that using rollback to revert it would be inappopriate, then don't revert it with rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Baby Boomer mediation

I replied on my talk page.--Knulclunk (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Request

Congratulations on your vandal-reverting work! However, could you please review this reversion? Thanks! Gail (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes sorry I will revert it. I was going too fast and I havent ever used huggle before so its just getting into it. But thanks for pointing it out to me. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry, just take it a little slower until you get used to the tool. It would also be courteous if you removed the warning on the IP's talk page (or left them a note retracting it). Keep up the effort! Gail (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good :) You might find the {{Welcome-anon}} template convenient for welcoming new users in the future. Take care! Gail (talk) 23:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Physical Therapy v Physiotherpay

Please see the Physical Therapy page history and discussion. User:TristanTzara seems to be going around changing common use english to British english. Please revert your edit of my change back to physical therapy. DoctorDW (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:My Talkpage

No problem. Really nasty vandalism. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Admin coachin

Looks like you're doing a good job so far, particularly in terms of vandal-fighting. However, you only about 900 contributions; while edit count isn't everything, candidates rarely pass RfA with fewer than 5,000 or so. So for the moment, I think admin coaching would be a good idea. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Cool thanks for also looking into it. I will apply and see if get a coach. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Use of ROLLBACK

Hi,

Please only use rollback for cases of blatant vandalism or blatant BLP violations. This edit was not an appropriate use of ROLLBACK. If you want to use HUGGLE to revert edits like that, please use the build in edit summary features to do so. Thanks. Protonk (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

• Ok.
  • this wasn't vandalism
  • this wasn't vandalism
  • neither this nor this were vandalism
  • this wasn't vandalism
  • this wasn't vandalism
  • neither was this
• I'm going to remove your rollback permission until it is clear that you understand WP:ROLLBACK and WP:VAND. Protonk (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Removed ROLLBACK

I've removed rollback privileges from this account. After it is clear that you understand the related procedures you can reapply at WP:PERM or from any admin, provided you inform them that your privileges were revoked previously. I'm sorry to have to do this. Protonk (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Restored Rollback

Hello! I found your page by accident and reviewed the situation at hand. Please be advised that I have restored your rollback rights -- your rights were removed without any appropriate warning of a potential problem, which I find to be an unfair punishment. That being said, please be aware that there has already been a concern raised on your use of rollback, and it is possible that these rights can be removed if the earlier situation is repeated. Thank you and be careful in your editing! :) Pastor Theo (talk) 01:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and sorry if I have got you into trouble over restoring the rollback. Corruptcopper (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Bear in mind that revocation of rollback is not a punishment, it is preventative. Protonk's comment clearly shows that the removal was indeed preventative. — neuro^(talk) 19:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

A better place to continue this discussion might be my talk page or Pastor Theo's, though I think things are pretty much ironed out. Protonk (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Message?

"Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Eidos Interactive has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)"

Sorry, but I haven't made any recent edits... I just logged on to my ISP a minute ago. 91.110.157.136 (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)