Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 11: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Shell Kinney (talk | contribs) →File:TJ logo sculpture.jpg: delete |
Undid revision 327412190 by 76.64.116.18 (talk) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:Brown">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Pui bottom--></div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:Brown">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Pui bottom--></div> |
||
==== [[:File:Chch1986.png]] ==== |
|||
This seems to be way beyond the standards of PD-textlogo, which is being abused on several TV station logos. Whatever the threshold of originality is, this is surely on the other side of it. Compare [[:File:NBC logo.svg]]. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])<sup>([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])</sup> 02:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Disagree, there are several users out there who consider this logo to be in public domain. [[User:Black Kite]], an admin who has been removing NF logos from television stations, has considered this logo to be in public domain. You can't compare a peacock to a logo with overlapping coloured circles. May I also refer you to [[Wikipedia:MCQ#Public_domain_question]]? <small><span style="border:2px solid #CC6600;padding:px;">[[User:Emarsee|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#CC6600;"> єmarsee </font>]] • [[User talk:Emarsee|<span style="font-family:corbel; color:#CC6600">Speak up!</span>]]</span></small> 04:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Logo is Public domain as it is not original enough as typeface and simple geometric shapes can not be copyrighted. Please see [[WP:Media copyright questions#Public domain question|this discussion]]. [[User:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Powergate92</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Talk</font>]]</small> 04:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*This looks to be a long way beyond. Overlapping geometric shapes are definitely copyrightable, otherwise I think we'd be claiming a lot of artwork as PD. A square is PD, a single word is PD, a single word in a square is PD. This is not PD. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:A circle is a basic geometric shape. Just because you put a bunch of them together and add colors doesn't suddenly make it original. Also, you can't compare this to the NBC logo, because that isn't using basic geometric shapes. --[[User:Noname2|Noname2]] ([[User talk:Noname2|talk]]) 14:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::We're not talking about the [[:File:Olympic flag.svg|Olympic rings]] here. <code>:^)</code> The work (as a whole) is more than basic geometry or text. It consists primarily of translucent, overlapping circles around a pincushion shape. Does a logo have to be 3D or shiny to be copyrightable? For comparison, we currently have the [[:File:NeXT logo.svg|NeXT]] (isometric cube) and [[:File:Pge svg.svg|PG&E]] (right triangle on square) logos under fair use. Though a bit more refined than the CHCH logo, they're both less complex (for instance, featuring only solid colors). – [[User:Mxn|Minh Nguyễn]] <small>([[User talk:Mxn|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Mxn|contribs]])</small> 11:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[:File:Ionlifelogo.png]] ==== |
==== [[:File:Ionlifelogo.png]] ==== |
Revision as of 23:49, 27 January 2010
September 11
This seems to be way beyond the standards of PD-textlogo, which is being abused on several TV station logos. Whatever the threshold of originality is, this is surely on the other side of it. Compare File:NBC logo.svg. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Disagree, there are several users out there who consider this logo to be in public domain. User:Black Kite, an admin who has been removing NF logos from television stations, has considered this logo to be in public domain. You can't compare a peacock to a logo with overlapping coloured circles. May I also refer you to Wikipedia:MCQ#Public_domain_question? єmarsee • Speak up! 04:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Logo is Public domain as it is not original enough as typeface and simple geometric shapes can not be copyrighted. Please see this discussion. Powergate92Talk 04:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- This looks to be a long way beyond. Overlapping geometric shapes are definitely copyrightable, otherwise I think we'd be claiming a lot of artwork as PD. A square is PD, a single word is PD, a single word in a square is PD. This is not PD. J Milburn (talk) 22:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- A circle is a basic geometric shape. Just because you put a bunch of them together and add colors doesn't suddenly make it original. Also, you can't compare this to the NBC logo, because that isn't using basic geometric shapes. --Noname2 (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- We're not talking about the Olympic rings here.
:^)
The work (as a whole) is more than basic geometry or text. It consists primarily of translucent, overlapping circles around a pincushion shape. Does a logo have to be 3D or shiny to be copyrightable? For comparison, we currently have the NeXT (isometric cube) and PG&E (right triangle on square) logos under fair use. Though a bit more refined than the CHCH logo, they're both less complex (for instance, featuring only solid colors). – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 11:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- We're not talking about the Olympic rings here.