Jump to content

User talk:Soetermans: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 340748712 by Dreaded Walrus (talk) - oops. One edit too many. Apologies
Acfreeze (talk | contribs)
Really dude?: new section
Line 25: Line 25:


Regardless of what you consider to be "notable", review sources and news outlets with history over five years is relevant. Also attempting to delete scores that you don't agree with and have been in place for several months is just plain childish. Please utilize Wikipedia the way it was intended and contribute instead of destroying. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Acfreeze|Acfreeze]] ([[User talk:Acfreeze|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Acfreeze|contribs]]) 17:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Regardless of what you consider to be "notable", review sources and news outlets with history over five years is relevant. Also attempting to delete scores that you don't agree with and have been in place for several months is just plain childish. Please utilize Wikipedia the way it was intended and contribute instead of destroying. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Acfreeze|Acfreeze]] ([[User talk:Acfreeze|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Acfreeze|contribs]]) 17:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Really dude? ==

You're having me banned because I posted a review on Wikipedia that you don't agree with and then you went on a cleaning spree removing months worth of contributions? And then you tell me you don't "appreciate" me sending you a message? Well doesn't it make sense to ask why you're deleting so much content?

But that is ok. No harm, no foul. If this is what keeps you going, then continue on friend. Enjoy.

Revision as of 17:38, 29 January 2010

Thank you! I will check over the links you provided. I'm not sure how to quote sources, when the source is my own personal experience and what I had read on forums of other people having the same issue. But i will keep checking! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtraver (talkcontribs) 01:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Soetermans! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 8 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Harrie Geelen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Imme Dros - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Snoopy D-O Double Gizzle

Thanks man - I see you're putting in work too - great stuff! Crateescape101 (talk) 04:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy Rain Facebook

I don't agree with it either. But at the moment it does count as a valid external link because it gives people an insight into the marketing style that Sony are using for the game. I suspect that pretty soon after the game's launch the site will go all but dead, and then become a viable candidate for removal. - X201 (talk) 09:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Deleting Everything

Regardless of what you consider to be "notable", review sources and news outlets with history over five years is relevant. Also attempting to delete scores that you don't agree with and have been in place for several months is just plain childish. Please utilize Wikipedia the way it was intended and contribute instead of destroying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acfreeze (talkcontribs) 17:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really dude?

You're having me banned because I posted a review on Wikipedia that you don't agree with and then you went on a cleaning spree removing months worth of contributions? And then you tell me you don't "appreciate" me sending you a message? Well doesn't it make sense to ask why you're deleting so much content?

But that is ok. No harm, no foul. If this is what keeps you going, then continue on friend. Enjoy.