Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Dog Theatre

Top Dog Theatre

Top Dog Theatre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. looks a bit like an advert. hardly any third party coverage. [1]. we don't have articles on every local amateur theatre company. LibStar (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

• Delete Seems no more notable than any number of amateur theatre groups, none of which are sufficiently notable for a wiki article. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 23:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:N Jeepday (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

• Keep, meets WP:N. The Press website has 3 fairly trivial mentions, but the ChCh Libraries website Papers Index / Subject search says "'Top Dog Theatre Company.' occurs 41 times"[2], and the Highbeam article linked in the article looks to be in-depth. XLerate (talk) 00:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
• Keep, I agree it meets WP:N, and I don't see why amatuer theatre companies are inherently non noteable. But I also agree it needs a rewrite to sound less like a promo.