Talk:God

Template:WP1.0

Incorrect use of "deistic" should be changed

In the introduction of this article, it says "God is a deity in deistic religions...". Deism refers to the belief that there is a "non-interfering" dvine creator, rather than any divine creator as would be implied here. As such, it should be removed from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.149.62 (talk) 03:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

GOD I LOVE YOU!!!!! DONT YOU DARE NOT BELIEVE IN HIM!!!!! IM WATCHING YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.195.169 (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

CLEMMIE YOU ARE POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Either remove the reference to distribution or do it the way it should be done, this is theology mongering and is linked to REAL theological terrorism.

Is it your intend to scare moslems, budhist, hindu´s and other theological belief systems through conglomeration of what are clearly distinct and seperate facets, mainstream and sects, of cristianity? Bigger might be better if you want that to become a social target and unite all other theologies against cristianity. If that is your intend, then we need to be ready for a theological war and prepair the Knights Templar and Knights Counter-Templar. Let me know.(Fractalhints (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC))

More significant relationships.

It would be nice if you added the relationship of the significance of god as a reference to chief/parent, angels as combatting forces in favor of god, adam and eve as civil society. These days, Cat and Dog have more relevance, especially as a symbolic reference to man and woman. Demons and Angels as symbolic references to the same. We are not living in the middle ages or in those times when the literate could pull the wool over anyone´s head and conglomerate opinion was forced on the population by a select few or through the premasticated opinion of one or two media writs as reference for the whole. Do check the relevance on polytheism, multiple distinct cristian sects IS polytheism, each depiction is sufficiently distinct to cause god to be distinct. The same name does not imply the same deity. If you need proof of this, I´ll be more than glad to provide similitudes of any name in relation. You are not the carrier of the only name of your sort. (Fractalhints (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC))