Talk:Terrestrial television: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 144.15.255.227 - "→POV: new section" |
Memestream (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:At least here (the UK), the term does ''not'' include cable; "terrestrial" is used as a synonym for "via an aerial", and includes both old-fashioned analogue services and [[Freeview]] (digital TV via an aerial). I don't know whether there ''is'' a direct US equivalent - "free to air" wouldn't work, since there are free satellite services and subscription digital terrestrial services. [[User:Loganberry|Loganberry]] ([[User talk:Loganberry|Talk]]) 13:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC) |
:At least here (the UK), the term does ''not'' include cable; "terrestrial" is used as a synonym for "via an aerial", and includes both old-fashioned analogue services and [[Freeview]] (digital TV via an aerial). I don't know whether there ''is'' a direct US equivalent - "free to air" wouldn't work, since there are free satellite services and subscription digital terrestrial services. [[User:Loganberry|Loganberry]] ([[User talk:Loganberry|Talk]]) 13:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
::In the US, what you get over an antenna (almost no one in the US would call it an "aerial") is called "broadcast" television. Seems to mean the same thing as you mean by "terrestrial".[[Special:Contributions/76.226.120.211|76.226.120.211]] ([[User talk:76.226.120.211|talk]]) 05:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC) |
::In the US, what you get over an antenna (almost no one in the US would call it an "aerial") is called "broadcast" television. Seems to mean the same thing as you mean by "terrestrial".[[Special:Contributions/76.226.120.211|76.226.120.211]] ([[User talk:76.226.120.211|talk]]) 05:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::Such use cannot make sense, because the phase "broadcast television" quite obviously has to mean "television that is broadcast" (as opposed to "narrowcast" or closed circuit), and therefore must include all satellite television. If the term is used as you say then it invited confusion and I am glad we have adopted the term terrestrial in the UK. --[[User:Memestream|Memestream]] ([[User talk:Memestream|talk]]) 15:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== POV == |
== POV == |
Revision as of 15:47, 6 February 2010
Stratavision
There does not appear to be any knowledge to date about Stratavision - television broadcasting by planes. It has been used on several occasions in the USA before microwave links and satellites and it was also used in Vietnam by AFRTS and other locations. MPLX/MH 21:20, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Definition Wrong?
Isn't "terrestrial television" simply the opposite of "satellite television"? i.e. doesn't the term include cable since this is also an earthbound medium?
BTW, the term is almost never used in the US. Tmangray 15:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- At least here (the UK), the term does not include cable; "terrestrial" is used as a synonym for "via an aerial", and includes both old-fashioned analogue services and Freeview (digital TV via an aerial). I don't know whether there is a direct US equivalent - "free to air" wouldn't work, since there are free satellite services and subscription digital terrestrial services. Loganberry (Talk) 13:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- In the US, what you get over an antenna (almost no one in the US would call it an "aerial") is called "broadcast" television. Seems to mean the same thing as you mean by "terrestrial".76.226.120.211 (talk) 05:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Such use cannot make sense, because the phase "broadcast television" quite obviously has to mean "television that is broadcast" (as opposed to "narrowcast" or closed circuit), and therefore must include all satellite television. If the term is used as you say then it invited confusion and I am glad we have adopted the term terrestrial in the UK. --Memestream (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- In the US, what you get over an antenna (almost no one in the US would call it an "aerial") is called "broadcast" television. Seems to mean the same thing as you mean by "terrestrial".76.226.120.211 (talk) 05:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
POV
This whole article is complete subjectivity POV commentary: "underwent a revolutionary transformation" "Suddenly found itself under attack". Lets stick to the facts and history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.15.255.227 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)