Jump to content

Talk:Elliptical wing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
physics: start, low, fluid
Nibios (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:


What about [http://englishrussia.com/?p=2331 these]?
What about [http://englishrussia.com/?p=2331 these]?
:That's an [[annular wing]], which is a completely different animal. [[User:Nibios|Nibios]] ([[User talk:Nibios|talk]]) 18:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:07, 9 February 2010

WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.
WikiProject iconPhysics: Fluid Dynamics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

I don't believe the 109 family has ellliptical wings. An elliptical wing is not the same thing as rounded wingtips which is what 109's have. Spitfire and P-47 are the best known aircraft with elliptical wings. - Emt147 Burninate! 05:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ellipse wing?

What about these?

That's an annular wing, which is a completely different animal. Nibios (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]