Talk:Poetics: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:32, 10 February 2010

Poetry Start‑class Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've expanded this stub and would like to continue upgrading it. I'm also currently working on Modernist poetry, and many of the sources I'll be using there should result in material that can be used to create further sections here. I expect this article to cooperate with the mentioned existing articles on figures of speech and on meter, but to be distinct from them in a focus on large-scale concerns that are more theoretical. William P. Coleman (talk) 16:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is rather horrid for such a broad and meaningful topic. Please improve. 76.122.18.1 (talk) 03:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement required

This article is in much need of improvement. In particular, the second section of the article refers far too much to a specific interpretation of poetics, rather than to the topic of poetics generally. Probably far more important would be an overview of the various theories of poetics, these being objectivism, formilism and Aristotelianism.

Also, I am not sure I understand why this is ranked of low importancce, where this concerns the overarching theories of poetry (and perhaps drama as well). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.84.248.99 (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:31, 10 February 2010 edit 87.84.248.99 (talk) →Improvement required: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:32, 10 February 2010 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,318 edits m Signing comment by 87.84.248.99 - "→Improvement required: new section" Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	This article is in much need of improvement. In particular, the second section of the article refers far too much to a specific interpretation of poetics, rather than to the topic of poetics generally. Probably far more important would be an overview of the various theories of poetics, these being objectivism, formilism and Aristotelianism.		This article is in much need of improvement. In particular, the second section of the article refers far too much to a specific interpretation of poetics, rather than to the topic of poetics generally. Probably far more important would be an overview of the various theories of poetics, these being objectivism, formilism and Aristotelianism.

	Also, I am not sure I understand why this is ranked of low importancce, where this concerns the overarching theories of poetry (and perhaps drama as well).		Also, I am not sure I understand why this is ranked of low importancce, where this concerns the overarching theories of poetry (and perhaps drama as well). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.84.248.99\|87.84.248.99]] ([[User talk:87.84.248.99\|talk]]) 14:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->