Talk:Babette Josephs: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:41, 10 February 2010

Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Pennsylvania Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it appropriate to put up the signature of living person on a wikipedia page, such as Babette Josephs. It seems mighty invasive to me. 128.213.48.184 (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with you, except that the image of her signature was located at Babette Joseph's official legislative website: http://babette.org/. It's right there on the main page. Since she's is the one who put it out there on the internet, she must not consider it invasive. --Blargh29 (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:10, 10 February 2010 edit 128.213.48.184 (talk) →Are signatures of living persons appropriate?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:41, 10 February 2010 edit undo Blargh29 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers 14,441 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Is it appropriate to put up the signature of living person on a wikipedia page, such as [[Babette Josephs]]. It seems mighty invasive to me. [[Special:Contributions/128.213.48.184\|128.213.48.184]] ([[User talk:128.213.48.184\|talk]]) 14:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		Is it appropriate to put up the signature of living person on a wikipedia page, such as [[Babette Josephs]]. It seems mighty invasive to me. [[Special:Contributions/128.213.48.184\|128.213.48.184]] ([[User talk:128.213.48.184\|talk]]) 14:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
			*I would agree with you, except that the image of her signature was located at Babette Joseph's official legislative website: http://babette.org/. It's right there on the main page. Since she's is the one who put it out there on the internet, she must not consider it invasive. --[[User:Blargh29\|Blargh29]] ([[User talk:Blargh29\|talk]]) 16:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)