Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanticism and Revolution: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ultraexactzz (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Romanticism and Revolution]]=== |
===[[Romanticism and Revolution]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD| |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|s}} |
||
:{{la|Romanticism and Revolution}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanticism and Revolution|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 10#{{anchorencode:Romanticism and Revolution}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanticism and Revolution}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
:{{la|Romanticism and Revolution}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanticism and Revolution|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 10#{{anchorencode:Romanticism and Revolution}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanticism and Revolution}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
Revision as of 16:46, 10 February 2010
- Romanticism and Revolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per original prod and prod2, this is an essay, not an encyclopedic article. Intrinsically WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 16:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep The article contains numerous good sources which testify to the notability of the topic such as Romanticism, Revolution, and Language; Romance and Revolution: Shelley and the Politics of a Genre; The French Revolution and the English Poets; Anger, Revolution, and Romanticism. As there is abundant material of this sort, it seems a straightforward matter to summarise it in an encyclopedic way. Any deficiencies in the current draft may be remedied by ordinary editing in accordance with our policy and deletion would obviously be unhelpful in this. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)