Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Recreating SPI case formerly under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide XIII; correct sockmaster.
Line 48: Line 48:
: That's all I can see there, sorry - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 01:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
: That's all I can see there, sorry - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 01:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


{{SPIclose}}
----
----

Revision as of 02:00, 12 February 2010

TungstenCarbide

TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.


Report date February 12 2010, 01:22 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Tbsdy lives

I have actually already blocked this editor per WP:DUCK, but I'd like to know what the primary account is. There is very clear evidence that they have edited before, as their first edit was to WP:AN/I and they showed a clear understanding of where the admin noticeboard is and they mentioned User:JzG by name. They also went straight to my user talk page to comment on an ongoing issue between myself and User:Giano, which a new account would not really be expected to know about. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]
  •  Confirmed - the following accounts as being the same editor;
That's all I can see there, sorry - Alison 01:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.