Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions
Recreating SPI case formerly under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide XIII; correct sockmaster. |
→Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: Marking as closed |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
: That's all I can see there, sorry - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 01:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
: That's all I can see there, sorry - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 01:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
{{SPIclose}} |
|||
---- |
---- |
Revision as of 02:00, 12 February 2010
TungstenCarbide
TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.
Report date February 12 2010, 01:22 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- TungstenCarbide XIII (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- I'm not sure, but there seems to be clear evidence that this is someone who already has an account. I think we had better find out who they are, as I've blocked them already. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 01:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Evidence submitted by Tbsdy lives
I have actually already blocked this editor per WP:DUCK, but I'd like to know what the primary account is. There is very clear evidence that they have edited before, as their first edit was to WP:AN/I and they showed a clear understanding of where the admin noticeboard is and they mentioned User:JzG by name. They also went straight to my user talk page to comment on an ongoing issue between myself and User:Giano, which a new account would not really be expected to know about. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Confirmed - the following accounts as being the same editor;
- TungstenCarbide XII (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TungstenCarbide XIII (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Notlikelytoforgetsoon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- I am not Paranoid (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- PalasKat (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- That's all I can see there, sorry - Alison ❤ 01:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser. |
{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.