User talk:PAustin4thApril1980: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 145 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:Paul Benjamin Austin/Archive 4, User talk:Paul Benjamin Austin/Archive 5. |
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:Paul Benjamin Austin/Archive 5. |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
If you bothered to look at the OFFICIAL service name which OfCom uses in the LICENCE issued for the London weekend service of Channel 3, as detailed at http://www.ofcom.org.UK/tv/ifi/tvlicensing/tvupdates/monthly/200811, you will see that it is ITV1 (London) NOT ITV1 (London Weekend). |
If you bothered to look at the OFFICIAL service name which OfCom uses in the LICENCE issued for the London weekend service of Channel 3, as detailed at http://www.ofcom.org.UK/tv/ifi/tvlicensing/tvupdates/monthly/200811, you will see that it is ITV1 (London) NOT ITV1 (London Weekend). |
||
== Service awards proposal == |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|||
|[[File:Editor - platinum star I.jpg|100px|Master Editor]] |
|||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}! I noticed you display a [[WP:Service awards|service award]], and would like to invite you to '''[[Wikipedia_talk:Service_awards#Renovation_proposal|join the discussion]]''' over a [[User:The_Man_in_Question/WIP|proposed revamping]] of the awards. |
|||
If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — <font face="gill sans">[[User:The Man in Question|the Man in Question]]</font> [[User_talk:The Man in Question|<small>(in question)</small>]] 01:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
== Service award update == |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|||
|<imagemap> |
|||
File:Editor_-_lapis_philosophorum_star.jpg|100px |
|||
default [[Wikipedia:Service awards]] |
|||
desc none |
|||
</imagemap> |
|||
| Hello, Paul Benjamin Austin! The requirements for the [[wp:Service awards|service awards]] have been updated, and you may no longer be eligible for the award you currently display. Don't worry! Since you have already earned your award, you are free to keep displaying it. However, you may also wish to update to the '''[[WP:Service awards|current system]]'''. |
|||
Sorry for any inconvenience. — <font face="gill sans">[[User:the Man in Question|the Man in Question]]</font> [[User talk:the Man in Question|<small>(in question)</small>]] 10:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Hoyden About Town]] == |
== [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Hoyden About Town]] == |
||
Revision as of 16:00, 14 February 2010
RE: Thames1989.jpg
Service name in OfCom licence issued for London weekend service is ITV1 (London) NOT ITV1 (London Weekend)
If you bothered to look at the OFFICIAL service name which OfCom uses in the LICENCE issued for the London weekend service of Channel 3, as detailed at http://www.ofcom.org.UK/tv/ifi/tvlicensing/tvupdates/monthly/200811, you will see that it is ITV1 (London) NOT ITV1 (London Weekend).
Speedy deletion nomination of Hoyden About Town
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
A tag has been placed on Hoyden About Town requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AlexHOUSE (talk) 23:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Still getting them
I received another of the "Can I talk to you?" e-mails today. Whoever was impersonating you a year ago still is. Regards, ProhibitOnions (T) 11:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)