Jump to content

Talk:Bacău County: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Vay~enwiki (talk | contribs)
Hungarian name
Line 2: Line 2:


BTW, what 2002 census is this article reffering to, cause according to the romanian one (see http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant.jsp?regiune_id=1&judet_id=2 and http://nepszamlalas.adatbank.transindex.ro/?pg=9&id=17) csangos and hungarians hardly made up 5.000 in this county, far from the ''around 10% or 51130 people'' this article claims [[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] 20:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
BTW, what 2002 census is this article reffering to, cause according to the romanian one (see http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant.jsp?regiune_id=1&judet_id=2 and http://nepszamlalas.adatbank.transindex.ro/?pg=9&id=17) csangos and hungarians hardly made up 5.000 in this county, far from the ''around 10% or 51130 people'' this article claims [[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] 20:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

::In this case I agree with the Romanian contributors, since the reasons for using the Hungarian names summarized at [[Talk:Harghita/Vote]] do not apply here (ie. traditional counties of Hungary ~ Romanian counties today, large minority groups, etc.). I don't think that "Bákó megye" would mean anything to anyone, be it a historian or an ethnic Hungarian in Romania. Maybe we should add the Hungarian names of the cities that have one (Iasi - Jászváros, Bacau - Bákó, etc). [[User:Vay|Vay]] 21:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:47, 8 January 2006

Khoikhoi, I don't think 1% of the population can be called a "large population". :-) bogdan 16:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, what 2002 census is this article reffering to, cause according to the romanian one (see http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant.jsp?regiune_id=1&judet_id=2 and http://nepszamlalas.adatbank.transindex.ro/?pg=9&id=17) csangos and hungarians hardly made up 5.000 in this county, far from the around 10% or 51130 people this article claims Anonimu 20:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I agree with the Romanian contributors, since the reasons for using the Hungarian names summarized at Talk:Harghita/Vote do not apply here (ie. traditional counties of Hungary ~ Romanian counties today, large minority groups, etc.). I don't think that "Bákó megye" would mean anything to anyone, be it a historian or an ethnic Hungarian in Romania. Maybe we should add the Hungarian names of the cities that have one (Iasi - Jászváros, Bacau - Bákó, etc). Vay 21:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]