Talk:Canonisation of John Henry Newman: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ian Spackman (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Catholicism|class=start|importance=mid}} |
|||
==Article title== |
==Article title== |
||
[[Canonization of John Henry Newman]] may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
[[Canonization of John Henry Newman]] may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:39, 15 February 2010
Article title
Canonization of John Henry Newman may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? Ian Spackman (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Technically you are right but I still think it works better as short-hand for the canonisation process. Otherwise we'll end up with 'Cause for the possible canonisation of Cardinal John Henry Newman' which seems rather a mouthful. But not opposed if others think it is more correct. Contaldo80 (talk) 10:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps I am being a bit pedantic; and I don’t see it as an enormous problem ;-) Ian Spackman (talk) 10:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)