Jump to content

Talk:Canonisation of John Henry Newman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Catholicism|class=start|importance=mid}}
==Article title==
==Article title==
[[Canonization of John Henry Newman]] may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
[[Canonization of John Henry Newman]] may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:39, 15 February 2010

WikiProject iconCatholicism Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconCanonisation of John Henry Newman is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article title

Canonization of John Henry Newman may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? Ian Spackman (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you are right but I still think it works better as short-hand for the canonisation process. Otherwise we'll end up with 'Cause for the possible canonisation of Cardinal John Henry Newman' which seems rather a mouthful. But not opposed if others think it is more correct. Contaldo80 (talk) 10:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I am being a bit pedantic; and I don’t see it as an enormous problem ;-) Ian Spackman (talk) 10:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]