Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/SimonP: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Mirv (talk | contribs)
16,966 edits
Dottoreso (talk | contribs)
1,197 edits
Line 50: Line 50:
#'''Support''' [[User:Freestylefrappe|freestylefrappe]] 04:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Freestylefrappe|freestylefrappe]] 04:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&#8212;[[User:Mirv|Charles&nbsp;P.]][[User talk:Mirv|&nbsp;<small>(Mirv)</small>]] 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#&#8212;[[User:Mirv|Charles&nbsp;P.]][[User talk:Mirv|&nbsp;<small>(Mirv)</small>]] 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dottoreso|Dottore So]] 04:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


==Oppose==
==Oppose==

Revision as of 04:37, 9 January 2006

SimonP

I'm quite interested in helping with Arbcom, but I have hesitated to put my name forward as I am reluctant to hand myself over to a selection process that doesn't yet seem to exist.

I've been a Wikipedians since December 2001 and have been an admin since December 2003 (which by extrapolation means that something good has to happen in December 2005). I currently have the distinction of being number one on the List of Wikipedians by number of edits. Sheer number of edits is a pretty meaningless statistic, but it does show that I have a fair amount of time to dedicate to the project.

I follow Arbcom fairly closely, but have only participated directly in only a couple of cases. I feel that in almost all cases the committee does its job admirably, though its speed is, as has often been noted, is sometimes far slower than ideal.

Questions

Support

  1. Support --Doc ask? 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. David | explanation | Talk 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. Owen× ☎ 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. Ambi 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Michael Snow 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support without reservations. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. – ugen64 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cryptic (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. —Kirill Lokshin 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Without question.--Sean|Black 00:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support. --GraemeL (talk) 00:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support -- PRueda29 / Ptalk29 / Pcontribs29 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jaranda wat's sup 00:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support. Carbonite | Talk 01:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support.--Bookandcoffee 01:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. JYolkowski // talk 01:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --nixie 01:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. TacoDeposit 01:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. An outstanding editor, admin and (hopefully soon to be) arbitrator. Batmanand 01:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support--Duk 01:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support definitely experienced --Angelo 01:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support —Ruud 02:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Trustworthy editor. Xoloz 02:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support, the biggest surprise is that there are opposers. Croat Canuck 02:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. Likely to be more moderate than some. Grace Note 02:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Account too new (created December 28, 2005 [1]). — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 03:32, Jan. 9, 2006
  28. Shanes 02:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. King of All the Franks 03:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Guettarda 03:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Jord 03:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support - BanyanTree 03:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Fred Bauder 03:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support 172 04:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support. Congrats, you spend way too much time on Wikipedia.--ragesoss 04:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Wile E. Heresiarch 04:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bobet 04:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support freestylefrappe 04:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. —Charles P. (Mirv) 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Dottore So 04:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Zach (Smack Back) Fair use policy 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. WhiteNight T | @ | C 01:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/SimonP&oldid=34455651"