Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
→Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: endorse for CU attention |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
||
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | |
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | Endorse}} <small>Original block log for TungstenCarbide [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ATungstenCarbide&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1 here]. Checkuser requested by [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|C]]•[[User:Ks0stm/Guestbook|G]])</sup> 06:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC) </small> |
||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> |
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> |
||
<!--## Codeletters are: |
<!--## Codeletters are: |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run --> |
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run --> |
||
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> |
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> |
||
:{{Endorse}} to check for sleepers and possible IP block. [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 16:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
Revision as of 16:24, 21 February 2010
TungstenCarbide
TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.
Report date February 21 2010, 06:51 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- TungstenCarbide XIX (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Ks0stm
Account created yesterday right in line with the naming pattern [1]. Suggest a checkuser to block IP or range, since TungstenCarbide has created 6 accounts since the February 11, 2010. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 06:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Original block log for TungstenCarbide here. Checkuser requested by Ks0stm (T•C•G) 06:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Clerk endorsed to check for sleepers and possible IP block. Tim Song (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)