Talk:List of coupled cousins: Difference between revisions
→Reduce royalty list?: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Let's face it, until the 20th century, for the most part, nearly every single royal couple were cousins of varying degrees. Can we remove some of the more distant examples, such as second cousins once removed, and perhaps keep a few very close examples and current ones? This list will never be exhaustive, it will always be somewhere in between, but it is much too long. [[Special:Contributions/142.68.138.25|142.68.138.25]] ([[User talk:142.68.138.25|talk]]) 23:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC) |
Let's face it, until the 20th century, for the most part, nearly every single royal couple were cousins of varying degrees. Can we remove some of the more distant examples, such as second cousins once removed, and perhaps keep a few very close examples and current ones? This list will never be exhaustive, it will always be somewhere in between, but it is much too long. [[Special:Contributions/142.68.138.25|142.68.138.25]] ([[User talk:142.68.138.25|talk]]) 23:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Napoleon III == |
|||
[[User:Nerissa-Marie|Nerissa-Marie]] ([[User talk:Nerissa-Marie|talk]]) 13:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC) I wonder why is Napoleon III's photo doing in this list? His wife, [[Eugénie de Montijo]] was in no way a relative of his, so there is not much reason for the emperor's photograph to be there. |
|||
Revision as of 13:55, 23 February 2010
Doesn't this seem a bit Redundant? --Mrdude 12:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not really. This list is more selective than the "Cousin couple" article; includes couples involving uncles, aunts, nephews and nieces; and is illustrated.
- There is room for both articles. Nihil novi 13:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Merge with "Cousin couple"?
It has been suggested that this article ("List of coupled cousins") be merged with "Cousin couple." Please see my remarks at "Merge with 'List of coupled cousins'?" (In brief, I oppose the idea.) Nihil novi 00:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- If it's going to be this long, it needs to be separate. Thmazing (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Order of royals
This article's "Notable individuals" section is arranged in alphabetical order. The list of European royalty does not appear to follow any order. Perhaps it would be well to place the royals in either alphabetical or chronological order? Nihil novi (talk) 10:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea. Chronology is tricky: birthdate, or ascending the throne? I'll try alphabetical by main first name. BrainyBabe (talk) 10:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh - bad edit conflict. I'll try again when you have finished uploading those great pictures! BrainyBabe (talk) 10:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Stephen Hopkins
What was his wife's name?75.142.50.33 (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Reduce royalty list?
Let's face it, until the 20th century, for the most part, nearly every single royal couple were cousins of varying degrees. Can we remove some of the more distant examples, such as second cousins once removed, and perhaps keep a few very close examples and current ones? This list will never be exhaustive, it will always be somewhere in between, but it is much too long. 142.68.138.25 (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Napoleon III
Nerissa-Marie (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC) I wonder why is Napoleon III's photo doing in this list? His wife, Eugénie de Montijo was in no way a relative of his, so there is not much reason for the emperor's photograph to be there.