Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Newman Luke/dDb: Difference between revisions
new |
keep for now |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====[[User:Newman Luke/dDb]]==== |
====[[User:Newman Luke/dDb]]==== |
||
This is a [[WP:Attack page]] hiding under the guise of WP policies. It is akin to carrying out threats of [[frivolous litigation]]. This user has created two other such similar "RfC" pages for two other editors at [[User:Newman Luke/Zq]] and [[User:Newman Luke/AV]] with whom he has disagreements over content. There are only two possibilities for him to have followed : (1) If it's a genuine RfC then he should file it without playing games. (2) If it's just there as as a scare tactic for him to compile alleged negative data "credit bureau style" he's in violation of launching and running an attack page on another user. If every disgruntled user started compiling such pages with data ''he'' deems to be "negative" from his own [[WP:POV]] against other users with whom he/she disagrees for quick usage to attack them relying on various manufactured [[WP:LAWYER]]ing moves on short notice should the need arise it would undermine everyone's ability to function in an atmosphere of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] knowing that one's opponent will threaten RfC's against them for holding views not in agreement with or in accordance with the attacker's own POV. This violates [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND]], [[WP:NOTWEBHOST]], [[WP:NOTANARCHY]], [[WP:NOTSCANDAL]] and [[WP:DISRUPT]] because it undermines the needed atmosphere of civility and co-operation. --[[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 23:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
This is a [[WP:Attack page]] hiding under the guise of WP policies. It is akin to carrying out threats of [[frivolous litigation]]. This user has created two other such similar "RfC" pages for two other editors at [[User:Newman Luke/Zq]] and [[User:Newman Luke/AV]] with whom he has disagreements over content. There are only two possibilities for him to have followed : (1) If it's a genuine RfC then he should file it without playing games. (2) If it's just there as as a scare tactic for him to compile alleged negative data "credit bureau style" he's in violation of launching and running an attack page on another user. If every disgruntled user started compiling such pages with data ''he'' deems to be "negative" from his own [[WP:POV]] against other users with whom he/she disagrees for quick usage to attack them relying on various manufactured [[WP:LAWYER]]ing moves on short notice should the need arise it would undermine everyone's ability to function in an atmosphere of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] knowing that one's opponent will threaten RfC's against them for holding views not in agreement with or in accordance with the attacker's own POV. This violates [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND]], [[WP:NOTWEBHOST]], [[WP:NOTANARCHY]], [[WP:NOTSCANDAL]] and [[WP:DISRUPT]] because it undermines the needed atmosphere of civility and co-operation. --[[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 23:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' for above reasons. [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 23:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' for above reasons. [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 23:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' for now. It seems clear to me that this is a draft RfC, which is permitted in User space. However, if the RfC is not properly initiated within a reasonable period of time, let's say one week, it should be '''deleted''' as an attack page. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] <sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 00:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:02, 26 February 2010
This is a WP:Attack page hiding under the guise of WP policies. It is akin to carrying out threats of frivolous litigation. This user has created two other such similar "RfC" pages for two other editors at User:Newman Luke/Zq and User:Newman Luke/AV with whom he has disagreements over content. There are only two possibilities for him to have followed : (1) If it's a genuine RfC then he should file it without playing games. (2) If it's just there as as a scare tactic for him to compile alleged negative data "credit bureau style" he's in violation of launching and running an attack page on another user. If every disgruntled user started compiling such pages with data he deems to be "negative" from his own WP:POV against other users with whom he/she disagrees for quick usage to attack them relying on various manufactured WP:LAWYERing moves on short notice should the need arise it would undermine everyone's ability to function in an atmosphere of WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL knowing that one's opponent will threaten RfC's against them for holding views not in agreement with or in accordance with the attacker's own POV. This violates WP:NPA, WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTANARCHY, WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:DISRUPT because it undermines the needed atmosphere of civility and co-operation. --IZAK (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete for above reasons. IZAK (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep for now. It seems clear to me that this is a draft RfC, which is permitted in User space. However, if the RfC is not properly initiated within a reasonable period of time, let's say one week, it should be deleted as an attack page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC)