Vassian Patrikeyev: Difference between revisions
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
At the [[monastery]], Patrikeyev became a student of [[Nil Sorsky]] and absorbed his philosophy. It appears that in 1503 Patrikeyev and Sorsky came to [[Moscow]] to attend a church council (''sobor''). During this ecclesiastic meeting, the two demanded leniency for the [[heretics]] and opposed [[Joseph Volotsky]]'s views on this issue, subsequently inflaming a dispute between the two parties in the form of personal letters. |
At the [[monastery]], Patrikeyev became a student of [[Nil Sorsky]] and absorbed his philosophy. It appears that in 1503 Patrikeyev and Sorsky came to [[Moscow]] to attend a church council (''sobor''). During this ecclesiastic meeting, the two demanded leniency for the [[heretics]] and opposed [[Joseph Volotsky]]'s views on this issue, subsequently inflaming a dispute between the two parties in the form of personal letters. |
||
During the reign of Vasili III, Patrikeyev reached an important status. Due to his rising influence, many heretics escaped severe punishment. At some point, the tsar even forbade Volotsky to defame Patrikeyev. It appears that [[Varlaam]], who had been close to Nil Sorsky and his followers, was elected [[Metropolitan bishop]] with some assistance from Vassian Patrikeyev. |
During the reign of Vasili III, Patrikeyev reached an important status. Due to his rising influence, many heretics escaped severe punishment. At some point, the tsar even forbade Volotsky to defame Patrikeyev. It appears that [[Varlaam, Metropolitan of Moscow|Varlaam]], who had been close to Nil Sorsky and his followers, was elected [[Metropolitan bishop]] with some assistance from Vassian Patrikeyev. |
||
In about 1517, Patrikeyev began his work on revision of the so-called ''Кормчая книга'' (Kormchaya kniga, or Book of guidelines; see [[Canon law]]), a code of ecclesiastic [[decree]]s and laws by the [[Byzantine emperor]]s. In 1518, [[Maximus the Greek]] came from [[Mount Athos]] to take part in his work, gathering [[Opposition (politics)|opposition]]ary people around him, including Vassian Patrikeyev. |
In about 1517, Patrikeyev began his work on revision of the so-called ''Кормчая книга'' (Kormchaya kniga, or Book of guidelines; see [[Canon law]]), a code of ecclesiastic [[decree]]s and laws by the [[Byzantine emperor]]s. In 1518, [[Maximus the Greek]] came from [[Mount Athos]] to take part in his work, gathering [[Opposition (politics)|opposition]]ary people around him, including Vassian Patrikeyev. |
Revision as of 00:11, 27 February 2010
Vassian Patrikeyev, also known as Vassian Kosoy (Вассиан Патрикеев, Вассиан Косой in Russian; real name - knyaz Василий Иванович Патрикеев, or Vasili Ivanovich Patrikeyev) (c. 1470 - between 1531 and 1545) was a Russian ecclesiastic and political figure and writer. Patrikeyev traced his male-line descent to Grand Duke of Lithuania Gediminas.
Political action
He was known to have been one of the leaders of the boyar party, which supported tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich (grandson of Ivan III) in a struggle against Sophia Paleologue's son Vasili for succession to the throne.
In ecclesiastic matters, the boyar party was generally closer to heretical and freedom-loving circles.
In 1499, Ivan III found out about the conspiracy against Vasili and ordered arrests (interestingly enough, the tsar first favored Dmitry Ivanovich). Vassian Patrikeyev was forced to take monastic vows and sent to Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery.
Ecclesiastic career
At the monastery, Patrikeyev became a student of Nil Sorsky and absorbed his philosophy. It appears that in 1503 Patrikeyev and Sorsky came to Moscow to attend a church council (sobor). During this ecclesiastic meeting, the two demanded leniency for the heretics and opposed Joseph Volotsky's views on this issue, subsequently inflaming a dispute between the two parties in the form of personal letters.
During the reign of Vasili III, Patrikeyev reached an important status. Due to his rising influence, many heretics escaped severe punishment. At some point, the tsar even forbade Volotsky to defame Patrikeyev. It appears that Varlaam, who had been close to Nil Sorsky and his followers, was elected Metropolitan bishop with some assistance from Vassian Patrikeyev.
In about 1517, Patrikeyev began his work on revision of the so-called Кормчая книга (Kormchaya kniga, or Book of guidelines; see Canon law), a code of ecclesiastic decrees and laws by the Byzantine emperors. In 1518, Maximus the Greek came from Mount Athos to take part in his work, gathering oppositionary people around him, including Vassian Patrikeyev.
In 1523, a Josephinian hegumen from Volokolamsk named Daniel was elected metropolitan. Soon after this, the church commenced prosecution of the opposition.
A few years later, Patrikeyev's influence began to weaken due to, among other things, his open disapproval of Vasili's divorce. In 1531, Vassian was summoned to appear before the church council as a defendant. Metropolitan Daniel accused Patrikeyev of unauthorized revision of the Kormchaya kniga; insertion of Hellenistic ideas; arbitrary removal of passages which had asserted the right of the monasteries to own patrimonies; revilement of miracle workers, e.g. Saint Makarius Kalyazinsky and Metropolitan Jonas; "heretic lines" in his translation of Simeon Metaphrastes' Life of St. Mary. The church council found Patrikeyev guilty and sent him to a hostile Joseph-Volokolamsk Monastery, where he would die a decade later.
Patrikeyev’s date of death is uncertain. He died no later than 1545 and a violent death, if one is to believe Ivan the Terrible's closest associate Andrei Kurbsky. He is not known to have left any descendants; however, there is a legend from Viipuri/Vyborg, the formerly Finnish seaport that is now in Russia, of a clandestine love affair between Patrikeyev-Kosoi and a local woman named Sigrid Toth. This would have occurred during the Swedish-Russian War of 1495-97, when Patrikeyev-Kosoi was the commander of the Russian army that invaded Swedish-controlled Finland. No mention is made of them having any children, but this is a possibility that should not be discounted. There is a DNA research project currently underway to discover the roots of the Gediminid and Rurikid dynasties - see www.familytreedna.com/public/rurikid. Since Patrikeyev-Kosoi was a Gediminid prince, this project could discover his possible male descendants, if they exist. They would probably be found in Finland today, or among people whose families were in Finland in the late 15th century. The two modern Gediminid families that would be most closely related to Patrikeyev-Kosoi are the Kurakin (Courakin) and Golitsyn (Galitzine) families. Males of these two family lines are encouraged to take the DNA test in order to help solve this mystery.