Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geek Code: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** Now, to the point: the most prominent reference is the [http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/G/geek-code.html own article] in the [[Jargon File]], currently maintained by somebody called [[Eric S. Raymond]] (his personal [http://catb.org/~esr/personal.html homepage] may give you some more clues on it). Btw, Jargon File is 26 years older than Wikipedia. Also, a quick [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22geek+code%22 lookup on Google] hints us about 69 books whose authors are aware about Geek Code and want either to tell about it a word or two, or at least mention their own geek codes in the book. This includes the books from marginal and sociological ones as [http://books.google.com/books?id=g80P_4v4QbIC&pg=PA214&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=1 The New Hacker's Dictionary] by the aforementioned Eric Raymond (and in fact being the print version of the Jargon File) or [http://books.google.com/books?id=NxAuOTt9cvIC&pg=PA40&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=2 Communities in Cyberspace] by [[Peter Kollock]], or [http://books.google.com/books?id=9qLYAAAAMAAJ&q=%22geek+code%22&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=6 Ethnologies] by the Folklore Studies Association of Canada (where the Geek Code named "one of the more fascinating folkloric creations to come out of the internet"); but also the books purely technical like [http://books.google.com/books?id=EeMKURpicCgC&pg=PA530&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=10#v=onepage&q=%22geek%20code%22&f=false The SAGE handbook of online research methods], or [http://books.google.com/books?id=tC0v2wMUW3YC&pg=PA296&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=11#v=onepage&q=%22geek%20code%22&f=false ENTERPRISE 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION]. [[User:Honeyman|Honeyman]] ([[User talk:Honeyman|talk]]) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
** Now, to the point: the most prominent reference is the [http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/G/geek-code.html own article] in the [[Jargon File]], currently maintained by somebody called [[Eric S. Raymond]] (his personal [http://catb.org/~esr/personal.html homepage] may give you some more clues on it). Btw, Jargon File is 26 years older than Wikipedia. Also, a quick [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22geek+code%22 lookup on Google] hints us about 69 books whose authors are aware about Geek Code and want either to tell about it a word or two, or at least mention their own geek codes in the book. This includes the books from marginal and sociological ones as [http://books.google.com/books?id=g80P_4v4QbIC&pg=PA214&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=1 The New Hacker's Dictionary] by the aforementioned Eric Raymond (and in fact being the print version of the Jargon File) or [http://books.google.com/books?id=NxAuOTt9cvIC&pg=PA40&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=2 Communities in Cyberspace] by [[Peter Kollock]], or [http://books.google.com/books?id=9qLYAAAAMAAJ&q=%22geek+code%22&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=6 Ethnologies] by the Folklore Studies Association of Canada (where the Geek Code named "one of the more fascinating folkloric creations to come out of the internet"); but also the books purely technical like [http://books.google.com/books?id=EeMKURpicCgC&pg=PA530&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=10#v=onepage&q=%22geek%20code%22&f=false The SAGE handbook of online research methods], or [http://books.google.com/books?id=tC0v2wMUW3YC&pg=PA296&dq=%22geek+code%22&ei=tDKJS7LNEoLWygSy18XADg&hl=ru&cd=11#v=onepage&q=%22geek%20code%22&f=false ENTERPRISE 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION]. [[User:Honeyman|Honeyman]] ([[User talk:Honeyman|talk]]) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
** Uh yes, and the latter book tells us that the geek code is a part of [[FOAF_(software)|FOAF ontology]] standard. That should close any other questions. [[User:Honeyman|Honeyman]] ([[User talk:Honeyman|talk]]) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
** Uh yes, and the latter book tells us that the geek code is a part of [[FOAF_(software)|FOAF ontology]] standard. That should close any other questions. [[User:Honeyman|Honeyman]] ([[User talk:Honeyman|talk]]) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' unless someone can come up with ''substantial'' coverage in ''reliable'' sources. I'm utterly unconvinced by the above. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 15:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:36, 27 February 2010
- Geek Code (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Potentially amusing, but doesn't make any real claim to notability. The only references are to blogs and personal web pages and the only implementations are personal projects. Why did you do it (talk) 10:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep If you don't see the formal notability references in the article - please bother to find and add them, before putting anything you don't understand for the deletion. Funny that I spotted this AfD request not by looking over some afd logs, but because I needed the information on the geek code myself, and the first place I decided to consult was Wikipedia. Honeyman (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Now, to the point: the most prominent reference is the own article in the Jargon File, currently maintained by somebody called Eric S. Raymond (his personal homepage may give you some more clues on it). Btw, Jargon File is 26 years older than Wikipedia. Also, a quick lookup on Google hints us about 69 books whose authors are aware about Geek Code and want either to tell about it a word or two, or at least mention their own geek codes in the book. This includes the books from marginal and sociological ones as The New Hacker's Dictionary by the aforementioned Eric Raymond (and in fact being the print version of the Jargon File) or Communities in Cyberspace by Peter Kollock, or Ethnologies by the Folklore Studies Association of Canada (where the Geek Code named "one of the more fascinating folkloric creations to come out of the internet"); but also the books purely technical like The SAGE handbook of online research methods, or ENTERPRISE 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION. Honeyman (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Uh yes, and the latter book tells us that the geek code is a part of FOAF ontology standard. That should close any other questions. Honeyman (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unless someone can come up with substantial coverage in reliable sources. I'm utterly unconvinced by the above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)