Jump to content

Talk:Gaming computer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Manufacturer list: new section
Line 4: Line 4:


Wikipedia is not an advertising site for links to every possible manufacturer. See [[WP:NOT#REPOSITORY]]. [[User:Turgan|Turgan]] <sup>[[User talk:Turgan|Talk]]</sup> 19:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an advertising site for links to every possible manufacturer. See [[WP:NOT#REPOSITORY]]. [[User:Turgan|Turgan]] <sup>[[User talk:Turgan|Talk]]</sup> 19:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

:More to the point, this list will eventually devolve into a laundry list. Just about every system builder has some kind of gaming model to offer. Does a list of manufacturers provide any useful information about the subject? I doubt it, and in the meantime it will continue to be a spam magnet. I suggest removal and will wait a bit for comments. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] ([[User talk:Ham Pastrami|talk]]) 08:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:10, 1 March 2010

WikiProject iconVideo games C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Manufacturer list

Wikipedia is not an advertising site for links to every possible manufacturer. See WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. Turgan Talk 19:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point, this list will eventually devolve into a laundry list. Just about every system builder has some kind of gaming model to offer. Does a list of manufacturers provide any useful information about the subject? I doubt it, and in the meantime it will continue to be a spam magnet. I suggest removal and will wait a bit for comments. Ham Pastrami (talk) 08:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]