Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerds With Attitude: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →[[Nerds With Attitude]]: add vote |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]] - [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]] - [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' --[[User:IslandHopper973|Islomaniac 973]] 17:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Why does it only "seem" to fail? |
*'''Delete''' --[[User:IslandHopper973|Islomaniac 973]] 17:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Why does it only "seem" to fail? |
||
*What? --[[User:220.101.30.98|220.101.30.98]] 07:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:58, 11 January 2006
Non-notable Geocities website, seems to fail WP:WEB; phrase yields 528 Google hits. Ohnoitsjamie 03:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per Ohnonitsjamie's reasons. OCNative 04:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom DrIdiot 04:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This was something I was going to nominate after dinner tonight, but it looks like someone beat me to it. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:27, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. NeoJustin 18:59, January 7, 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Bjelleklang - talk 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Islomaniac 973 17:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Why does it only "seem" to fail?