Talk:Unfaithful (2002 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:33, 3 March 2010

Chicago B‑class

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Unfaithful (2002 film) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 27, 2008). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Film: British / American B‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Unfaithful.JPG

Image:Unfaithful.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

I'll be doing the GA review for this article. Here are some questions I had while reading the article:

The part about the actors gaining weight left me wondering if they did. Did Lane? Did Gere?
Biziou often used two cameras for the film's intimate scenes in order to spare the actors any discomfort. - how would this decrease discomfort?
What were the other endings? What got re-shot? What did the test audiences not like about the ending that made them go back to the original?
What happened with Fatal Attraction that would make the director shoot five endings?
How did the video do on DVD? In rentals?

I'll do a copy edit of the article once all of these questions are answered. The article will remain on hold for one week. Good luck! Nikki311 01:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because there has been no improvements made to the article, I am failing it. Nikki311 02:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

"The filming proved to be challenging for the actors who had to endure smoke being piped in during scenes for 18 to 20 hours a day."

I don't understand this sentence. Where and why was smoke being piped in? What scenes? 18 to twenty hours a day? The actors are working for that long each day? What?? TripOnMyShip (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the soundtrack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.76.64.65 (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic Lead Paragraph

With all due respect, this lead paragraph is way too long. It should be about the film and not about how tough it was to shoot the film; that belongs in production. Perhaps a summary should be included, but not a documentary. –TashTish (talk)

Detective's photos

The film showed the detective handing Sumner the photos he had taken of Constance and Paul. He did not give him the negatives. Why did the film fail to show him doing this or are PIs legally required to keep the negatives of photos taken for their clients?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 With all due respect, this lead paragraph is way too long. It should be about the film and not about how tough it was to shoot the film; that belongs in production. Perhaps a summary should be included, but not a documentary. –[[User:TashTish|TashTish]] ([[User talk:TashTish|talk]])
 == Detective's photos==
-The film showed the detective handing Sumner the photos he had taken of Constance and Paul. He did not give him the negatives. Why did the film fail to show him doing this or are PIs legally-required to keep the negatives of photos taken for their clients?--[[User:Jeanne boleyn|Jeanne Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Jeanne boleyn|talk]]) 13:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
+The film showed the detective handing Sumner the photos he had taken of Constance and Paul. He did not give him the negatives. Why did the film fail to show him doing this or are PIs legally required to keep the negatives of photos taken for their clients?--[[User:Jeanne boleyn|Jeanne Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Jeanne boleyn|talk]]) 13:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)