Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Ciklum: delete |
Niteshift36 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom, no notability. [[User:Haakon|Haakon]] ([[User talk:Haakon|talk]]) 20:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom, no notability. [[User:Haakon|Haakon]] ([[User talk:Haakon|talk]]) 20:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' and '''salt''' as repeatedly re-created deleted page. This is an ''IT outsourcing'' company. Inclusion on "top 100 business" lists is no claim of notability; creation of the list does not automatically confer notability on 100 otherwise unremarkable businesses. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 15:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' and '''salt''' as repeatedly re-created deleted page. This is an ''IT outsourcing'' company. Inclusion on "top 100 business" lists is no claim of notability; creation of the list does not automatically confer notability on 100 otherwise unremarkable businesses. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 15:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nom. Why wasn't is speedy deleted? [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 02:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:12, 6 March 2010
AfDs for this article:
- Ciklum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously deleted, immediately re-created by the same WP:SPA, Ciklum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Claim to notability is a placing in a list by Red Herring magazine, which is currently unverifiable as the pages are 404. Almost entirely the work of an agent of the company. Sources are largely not independent (i.e. repeats of press releases). Needs deletion or a complete rewrite with new sources, IMO. Guy (Help!) 23:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, no notability. Haakon (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete and salt as repeatedly re-created deleted page. This is an IT outsourcing company. Inclusion on "top 100 business" lists is no claim of notability; creation of the list does not automatically confer notability on 100 otherwise unremarkable businesses. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Why wasn't is speedy deleted? Niteshift36 (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)