Talk:2009–10 Melbourne Victory FC season: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
assess |
m Bot: suspected broken section links |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:WildBot/tag}} |
|||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WPBS|1= |
{{WPBS|1= |
||
Revision as of 17:37, 8 March 2010
 | WildBot has stopped running and will not check this page. You can still use the Dablinks tool to check this page for links to disambiguation pages. This tag can be safely removed. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009–10 Melbourne Victory FC season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Template:WPFootballinAus
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Results & Fixture Summary
Is there a reason for having both the Results and the fixture summary? It seems they could be combined into the one table which holds all the information, and we don't have to duplicate information as we do now. I would suggest the style used in Brisbane Roar page. Tomwijgers (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)