User talk:Petiatil/Archive 2

Deleted page

I am following up on a page that indicates that you proposed for deletion. It is the Online School for Girls, which is a non-profit school formed this summer by a consortium of four independent all-girls' school. It is the first online school dedicated to the secondary education of girls. We believe the information was accurate and striped of any marketing language. We are requesting that it be reinstated. Thank you. Jmamenta (talk) 04:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Jmamenta

hi

hi, u left a message on my talk page, i didnt get it. Wht the actual purpose was ? regards الله أكبرMohammad Adil 14:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Not Sure, nevermind. petiatil ^»speak 11:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. decltype (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Dahn Yoga

Hi Petiatil,

Dahn Yoga is a certifiable cult, and this article doesn't reflect the damage it has done. Please don't revert the changes I've made. Thanks much. 58.140.133.35

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Oops! Haha! petiatil ^»speak 09:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

The warning you issued me

I see you're new to rollback and Huggle. You issued me a warning here for making this vandalism reversion. Please be more careful when using Huggle- mistakes such as this one are fairly easy. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 09:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Question and a pointer

Did you mean to make this edit? Looks like a mistake. Also, your signature doesn't contain a link to either your user page or talk page, so User:SineBot is auto-signing every one of your Huggle-issued warnings. If you don't want it to do that, you can follow the directions on its talk page to opt out of its grasp, though I understand some users frown on signatures like yours, so you may want to add a link instead. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 09:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I mean that without any links, someone can't click on your signature to find who you are or send you a message. Instead, they have to go to the page history and find who left the message, or manually type in your name in search box. From WP:Signatures: Signatures must include at least one internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log. The lack of such a link is widely viewed as obstructive. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 09:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Looks good. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Troll or ?

Your purpose here is to protect the work of trolls? Because that's pretty much what you did by reverting an edit of mine that deleted the work of a vandal. Next time, check more carefully. 24.24.210.206 (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure it was an edit conflict of some sort . petiatil ^{»user»speak} 09:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_Software

Please retain my changes.

I have re-arranged the information on this article to properly reflect the references. This page is borderline spam because it has no references other than product announcements and not one independent article discussing the product. I moved the references to Company Announcements and Product Releases. I feel that this is where the links belong, not as references to justify the article to be noteworthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.176.238.10 (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Paddy Usher

Hi, I saw you added a CSD tag to Paddy Usher under the A7 criterion. Don't you think "received airplay in top Irish stations" is a claim to notability? I'm not going to remove the tag because the article history seems a right mess, just figured I'd add my two bits in... Cheers! XXX antiuser ^eh? 13:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

No, I wasn't sure either, but I figured if i put the tag on there, an admin would come along and make the right decision, plus I also tagged it with other templates as well, hopefully the original author will clean it up, among other things. -petiatil ^{»user»speak} 15:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

NY2000

Any chance you can do something about User:NY2000? He's been vandalising all night. 99.146.38.73 (talk) 09:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

come on man

this is funny. no one really cares about that lady. let it slide this once.

nah i'm kidding i'll stop. but please answer this question for me.

do you get payment for patrolling wikipedia or just do it because you stalwartly believe in the free encyclopedia thing. i am genuinely curious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.227.52 (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

About my edit on the Entertainment Software Rating Board article

Hi, Kyrios320 here. you have handed me a useless message as you should see ESRB's website as obvious proof that the organisation is still named ESRB till now. I hope you allow that revert to stay. Kyrios320 (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Chelsea Scores!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashusheva (talk • contribs) 19:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for the revert on my user page. I appreciate your watching my back. Cheers, mate! Geoff ^{Who, me?} 18:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem, I usually don't revert Talk pages, however, that revision was clearly vandalism. Anytime. Cheers. -petiatil ^{»user»speak} 19:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Petiatil, It appears you requested the deletion of the Online School for Girls that I uploaded as a board member. This is a non-profit online school tha was formed this summer by four independent girls' schools to provide the first online school for the secondary education for girls in the United States. We felt the information posted was accurate and striped of any marketing language. How do we go about having the page reinstated? Thank you. Jmamenta —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmamenta (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Booza ( arabic gum ice cream )

I think the value "Dondurma" ( Turkish gum ice cream ) should unite with the value "Booza" (Arabic gum ice cream). burekas (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Restoring removed WP:PROD templates

[1] Once a proposed deletion template has been removed, the deletion is considered contested and proposed deletion is no longer an option. Since a speedy deletion of this article has also been declined, the only remaining course of action is a deletion discussion. While it is preferred that the user removing the prod provide a rationale, it is not actually required. See WP:CONTESTED for details. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

SONSOFDAY

Take a look again, especially at the history. I added the db-band tag and changed it when a claim of notability was added. You need to revert your bad edit and remove the warning from my talk page. 98.248.40.19 (talk) 07:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

What gives you the idea that only admins can remove a db tag? Only the creator of the article is prohibited from doing so. In fact, the tag itself states "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice..." You obviously need to stop reverting pages if you don't understand the basics of the guidelines. 98.248.40.19 (talk) 07:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Abdul Aziz Al Ghurair

You need to better familiarize yourself with the MOS for bios - we don't use the full name every time. 98.248.40.19 (talk) 07:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

What are you talking about, can you be more specific? -petiatil ^{»user»speak} 07:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)