Talk:Ciampate del Diavolo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
done |
Found ambiguous links to Roccamonfina |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:WildBot/msg|1=Roccamonfina}} |
|||
Suggest rewording to better represent the uncertainty of the origin of the footprints. The provided external link leaves great doubt as to the provenance of the footprints. The text "In 2003 it was however discovered that they belong to Homo heidelbergensis, a hominid living in the area some 350,000 years ago." appears to overstep the bounds of reasonable representation of the evidence provided. |
Suggest rewording to better represent the uncertainty of the origin of the footprints. The provided external link leaves great doubt as to the provenance of the footprints. The text "In 2003 it was however discovered that they belong to Homo heidelbergensis, a hominid living in the area some 350,000 years ago." appears to overstep the bounds of reasonable representation of the evidence provided. |
||
[[User:Bowlingj|Bowlingj]] ([[User talk:Bowlingj|talk]]) 09:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Bowlingj|Bowlingj]] ([[User talk:Bowlingj|talk]]) 09:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 12:54, 9 March 2010
 | Links from this article which need disambiguation (check | fix): Roccamonfina
For help fixing these links, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Fixing a page. Last updated by WildBot | FAQ | Report a problem |  |
Suggest rewording to better represent the uncertainty of the origin of the footprints. The provided external link leaves great doubt as to the provenance of the footprints. The text "In 2003 it was however discovered that they belong to Homo heidelbergensis, a hominid living in the area some 350,000 years ago." appears to overstep the bounds of reasonable representation of the evidence provided. Bowlingj (talk) 09:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've just attributed them to an unspecified hominid. -- Avenue (talk) 00:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)