Talk:Rome (TV series): Difference between revisions

; Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2; Archive 3;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:18, 16 March 2010

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Rome (TV series). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Rome (TV series) at the Reference desk.

Before asking a question here concerning what can and cannot be posted in this article, please refer to the following Wikipedia rules:

What Wikipedia Is Not (Policy)
Neutral Point of View (Policy)
No Original Research (Policy)
Verifiability (Policy)
Reliable Sources (Guideline)
Disruption of Wikipedia to Prove a Point (Guideline)

Citations

What's the deal with showing only the year of publication of reference material? Though I agree with tidy dates (2010-03-12, say) the loss of month and day info can make digging up dead links a bit harder. --Lexein (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 == Citations ==
-What's the deal with showing only the year of publication of reference material?  Though I agree with tidy dates (2010-03-12, say) the loss of month and day info can make digging up dead links a bit harder.  And links do die; for example, the Teleblog link is now dead. Oh well, it was just a blog anyways.
+What's the deal with showing only the year of publication of reference material?  Though I agree with tidy dates (2010-03-12, say) the loss of month and day info can make digging up dead links a bit harder.
 --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 19:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)