User talk:AmazingAthiest: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Sockpuppetry case: Blocked as a sock puppet |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] case. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Islamuslim]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to cases]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 17:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC) |
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] case. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Islamuslim]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to cases]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 17:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left]] You have been {{#ifeq:yes|yes|'''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely'''|{{#if:|[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] '''{{{time}}}'''|temporarily '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]'''}}}} {{#switch:sock|sock=as a '''[[WP:SOCK|sock puppet]]'''|sock=for '''sock'''|for repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. (blocked by –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 21:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC))<br /> |
|||
<small>You may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.</small></div> |
Revision as of 21:32, 5 April 2010
Tagging attack pages
Hi. Thanks for tagging Levi Card just now, but there was a better tag to use. {{db-nonsense}} is only intended for the likes of "7%@##rq£5**#gxq!*@?!!" and "Yaaaaayyyy LOLLL!!!" Where a page is a personal attack like that, what you should do is blank out the whole content and replace it with {{db-attack}} or {{db-atk}}. That gets the attack of the screen so the attacker can't giggle over it or show it to people, puts it in a high-priority queue for admin attention, and generates a suitably fierce message for you to copy to the attacker's talk page. There is good advice about speedy tagging at WP:10CSD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Better still is to use {{db-attack|blanked=yes}} when you blank the page. This avoids getting the "Please blank this page so that it only contains the deletion template." message. Peridon (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Islamuslim for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. O Fenian (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.