Talk:KMFDM/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   KMFDM Records in the infobox redirects back to this article, KMFDM. A double redirect

   [While recognized within the ranks of Nitzer Ebb, Ministry, and Skinny Puppy as pioneers in introducing industrial music to mainstream audiences, KMFDM describes their sound as "The Ultra-Heavy Beat". Surely recognized "along with"?

   ...a fusion of electronic and heavy metal, with occasional elements of reggae, ska, and even rap. The word "even" conveys a point of view.

   KMFDM is not without a sense of humor, however. again this tends to convey a point of view.

   KMFDM has put on an album on average every year and a half, and usually tours at least once in support of each album. "put out", I think is meant here.

   KMFDM is an initialism for the nonsensical and grammatically incorrect German phrase "Kein Mehrheit Für Die Mitleid", . I think "acronym" is a better word to use here.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   refs # 60 through 68 MySpace is not a WP:RS. See WP:Attribution/FAQ#Are IRC, MySpace, and YouTube reliable sources?

   ref #53 [1] is a dead link

   All on-line references should be formatted consistently with publisher details and retrieval date.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, on hold fro seven days for above issues to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)