Talk:Giant Bomb: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:10, 10 April 2010

Video games C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Front page

I removed the image of the front page. The site has not launched yet, its just the blog. The site needs to launch first and then there should be a screenshot. -- Coasttocoast (talk) 05:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because Giant Bomb is only in it's blog phase right now, doesn't mean we can't show a screenshot of what the blog looks like. It is written under the image that it is only a screenshot of the blog phase of Giant Bomb. Once the full site opens, we can change to image to a screenshot of the front page of the complete website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakeelens (talk • contribs) 13:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaming Wiki

Updated the site definition, it is a gaming wiki based on Comicvine's software. --192.154.91.225 (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

There is no mention of how Giantbomb is supported, the site does not run any ads beside the Giantbomb iPhone app. Anyone have any insight on this? Jayrossss (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They do run advertising, but not all the time. See Giant Bomb Sells Out. I've also seen a page targeted at the advertisers themselves, but I can't find it anymore. No matter, since the page is of little use to people like us anyway. Reach Out to the Truth 05:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Would it be appropriate to include criticism section? For example: slow load times, glitchy video player and such? Has this type of section been ever included in a "website" wiki? -Andriyko (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has any of that stuff been discussed in reliable sources? Reach Out to the Truth 02:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:04, 10 April 2010 edit Andriyko (talk \| contribs) 125 edits →Criticism: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:10, 10 April 2010 edit undo Reach Out to the Truth (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 27,709 edits →Criticism Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Would it be appropriate to include criticism section? For example: slow load times, glitchy video player and such? Has this type of section been ever included in a "website" wiki? [[User:Andriyko\|-Andriyko]] ([[User talk:Andriyko\|talk]]) 01:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)		Would it be appropriate to include criticism section? For example: slow load times, glitchy video player and such? Has this type of section been ever included in a "website" wiki? [[User:Andriyko\|-Andriyko]] ([[User talk:Andriyko\|talk]]) 01:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
			:Has any of that stuff been discussed in reliable sources? [[User talk:Reach Out to the Truth\|Reach Out to the Truth]] 02:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)