Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m sp |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
And done. Please all, let us stick to discussing how we can best go about engaging in writing and improving articles, and take the philosophical arguments somewhere else. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 23:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC) |
And done. Please all, let us stick to discussing how we can best go about engaging in writing and improving articles, and take the philosophical arguments somewhere else. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 23:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
Why was the discussion I started on the silliness of changing "Miss" and "Mrs." to |
|||
"Ms." archived? This whole project is motivated by a philosophical argument, and to the extent that the philosophical arguments motivate your proposed article "improvements" and "writing," I think they merit discussion. |
|||
The archiving of this discussion is deceptive. You are launching an ideologically-influenced campaign under the guise of good wikipedia housekeeping. |
|||
Nathaniel |
|||
Revision as of 07:37, 17 January 2006
Please remember to sign your name with ~~~~ (IP users can do this too). Please also append new material to the bottom of the page or relevant section. Thanks!
Archive: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender Studies/archive1
And done. Please all, let us stick to discussing how we can best go about engaging in writing and improving articles, and take the philosophical arguments somewhere else. Ambi 23:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Why was the discussion I started on the silliness of changing "Miss" and "Mrs." to "Ms." archived? This whole project is motivated by a philosophical argument, and to the extent that the philosophical arguments motivate your proposed article "improvements" and "writing," I think they merit discussion.
The archiving of this discussion is deceptive. You are launching an ideologically-influenced campaign under the guise of good wikipedia housekeeping.
Nathaniel