Jump to content

Talk:2009–10 Melbourne Victory FC season: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WildBot (talk | contribs)
m No broken #section links left
WildBot (talk | contribs)
Found ambiguous links to Peter Green, Ben Williams; Found broken #section links to #notes_qr1
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:WildBot/m01|dabs={{User:WildBot/m03|1|Peter Green}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Tim Brown}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Ben Williams}}|m01}}
{{User:WildBot/m01|dabs={{User:WildBot/m03|1|Peter Green}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Ben Williams}}|m01}}
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WPBS|1=
{{WPBS|1=
Line 6: Line 6:
{{Football|class=start|importance=low|season=yes}}
{{Football|class=start|importance=low|season=yes}}
}}
}}
{{User:WildBot/m04|sect={{User:WildBot/m03|3|Melbourne Victory season 2009–10#notes_qr1|1|#notes_qr1}}|m04}}


== Results & Fixture Summary ==
== Results & Fixture Summary ==

Revision as of 22:14, 10 April 2010

Results & Fixture Summary

Is there a reason for having both the Results and the fixture summary? It seems they could be combined into the one table which holds all the information, and we don't have to duplicate information as we do now. I would suggest the style used in Brisbane Roar page. Tomwijgers (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]