Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Date maintenance tags and general fixes using AWB |
Legalskeptic (talk | contribs) changed year category |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]] |
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]] |
||
[[Category:1936 in law]] |
[[Category:1936 in United States case law]] |
||
Revision as of 23:34, 14 April 2010
 | This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. (October 2009) |
| Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued October 12, 1936 Decided November 9, 1936 | |
| Full case name | Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co. |
| Citations | 299 U.S. 65 (more) |
| Holding | |
| An inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Sutherland |
| Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
See also
Further reading
- Colby, Wm. E. (1942). "The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation". California Law Review. 30 (3): 245–271. doi:10.2307/3477673.
{{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help)
Text of Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936) is available from: Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |