Talk:2010 Nuclear Security Summit: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:09, 20 April 2010

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

International relations Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject DC

A news item involving 2010 Nuclear Security Summit was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 April 2010.

Wikipedia

Title

There is a planned summit in South Korea in 2 years. Would 2010 Nuclear Security Summit be a better title for this article? --BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 23:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article for the 2012 summit has been created as well at: Nuclear Security Summit (2012). To me, it's "six of one, half a dozen of another" to have the year at the beginning. Plus, 2010 Nuclear Security Summit is a redirect to this article so it will get people here.

So, to summarize, we currently have:

Nuclear Security Summit (2010)

Nuclear Security Summit (2012)

~~My vote is Keep as is.~~ —Diiscool (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. On second thought, looking at what has been done with Commons:Category:2010 Nuclear Security Summit and a number of other conferences and summits, I don't mind if someone moves this article—well, switches this article—with "2010 Nuclear Security Summit" (but don't forget to do 2012 Nuclear Security Summit too). —Diiscool (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Schedule Info

Why is the Schedule Section completely devoted to only detailing the US president's schedule? Wouldn't it be better if some other countries schedules were included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackRendar (talk • contribs) 14:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A table could be added if anyone were to provide a schedule with such information. If you have one, feel more than happy to add it.--76.213.221.152 (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added most of the schedule information as I could find it. I was aware as I added it that it seemed to be very Obama-centered but I could not find further information easily. It was definitely not my intention for it to be US-centric. Please do add more schedule information if you find it. —Diiscool (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The request to rename this article to 2010 Nuclear Security Summit has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

Nuclear Security Summit → 2010 Nuclear Security Summit — More specific as to time and to distinguish between this summit and the planned summit in 2012. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 18:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support: I support the addition of 2010 to the title. This will distinguish the Summit from the planned Nuclear Security Summit (2012). —Diiscool (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support: 2010 Nuclear Security Summit is a common name found in many sources: [1] ("..international organizations for the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit held here through tomorrow."), [2] ("..Obama said yesterday at the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit"), etc.--76.213.221.152 (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This was originally named "Nuclear Security Summit (2010)" for that reason. Simesa (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 *'''Support''': I support the addition of 2010 to the title. This will distinguish the Summit from the planned [[Nuclear Security Summit (2012)]]. —[[User:Diiscool|Diiscool]] ([[User talk:Diiscool|talk]]) 21:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Support''': ''2010 Nuclear Security Summit'' is a common name found in many sources: [http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=58714] ("..international organizations for the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit held here through tomorrow."), [http://www.executivegov.com/2010/04/highlights-of-nuclear-security-summit/] ("..Obama said yesterday at the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit"), etc.--[[Special:Contributions/76.213.221.152|76.213.221.152]] ([[User talk:76.213.221.152|talk]]) 00:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Support''' - This was originally named "Nuclear Security Summit (2010)" for that reason. [[User:Simesa|Simesa]] ([[User talk:Simesa|talk]]) 00:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 ===Discussion===