Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Peterson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions |
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under People |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] ([[User talk:Epbr123|talk]]) 11:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] ([[User talk:Epbr123|talk]]) 11:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
* <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)</span> |
* <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)</span> |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 17:38, 22 April 2010
- Debra Peterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After four years a two line uncited stub. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Wikipedia:Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment At the time of the article's creation, subject was notable. However, the guideline has changed since then: simply being a "Playboy Playmate" no longer means that notability is guaranteed. A question here is whether this article can be kept per some kind of "grandfather clause". Still, I would say that this is probably a delete because it's an unreferenced BLP and I can't see notability under the new criteria. Gosox(55)(55) 21:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)